Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur33 Hyderabad32 Chennai22 Bangalore16 Delhi13 Mumbai9 Ahmedabad9 Indore7 Visakhapatnam4 Surat4 Kolkata4 Rajkot3 Jodhpur2 Chandigarh2 Lucknow2 Patna2 Raipur2 Cochin1 Panaji1 Agra1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 1442

MANISH KUMAR CHATURVEDI,JHANSI vs. ITO WARD 2(3)(2), JHANSI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 41/AGR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra06 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Manish Kumar Chaturvedi, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 1882, Shivaji Nagar, Jhansic Ward-2(3)(2), 284001 Jhansi 284 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Akkpc5294Q Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 06/02/2025

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. DR

Section 142Section 144Section 250

penalty proceedings u/s 274 r.w.s 271 of the Act and under section 270A(2) (b) and 271F of the Act is unwarranted. Manish Kumar Chaturvedi 9. That the appellate order dated 01.12.2023 passed by the Ld. CIT (A) is against the law and facts of the appellant's case.” 3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issuance