Search: house property

11 results for “house property”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14844 Section 14721 Section 26318 Section 148A15 Section 15110 Section 143(3)7 Reassessment7 Reopening of Assessment6 Section 151A5 Section 144B

YOGENDRA SHARMA,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAH

In the result, the appeal preferred by assessee is allowed

ITA 408/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Yogendra Sharma, I-4695, 2Nd Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Floor, Gali No. 4-B, Balbir Nagar Ward 3(2), Etah. Extension, Shahdara, Delhi. Pan :Cgkps6492J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50C

short-term capital gains by estimating/substituting the cost of acquisition is bad in law and on facts. The Assessing Officer could not have adopted an estimated cost in place of the Appellant's evidenced cost without any reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under section 55A; mere estimation is impermissible. 8. Because having regard to the facts and circumstances

YOGENDRA SHARMA,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAH

YOGENDRA SHARMA,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAH

SATISH PRAKASH AGARWAL,AGRA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2)(1), AGRA, AGRA

AKHLESH KUMAR TIWARI,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AGRA

RADHA GUPTA,KALA MAHAL, AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1)(3), , AGRA

SMT. SARIKA SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

SHRI ATUL SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

HARICHARAN RATHORE,ASHOK NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

ASHOK SAHU,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), JHANSI, JHANSI

SUNITA,SAHU vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

NARAYANI RATHORE,SHIVPURI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

BADARIPRASAD,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER GUNA, GUNA