ACIT CIRCLE-4, AGRA vs. JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 2(15) of the said Act would be that it carves out an exception from the charitable purpose of advancement of any other object of general public utility and that exception is limited to activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business

BHARTI BANSAL,AGRA vs. DCIT-1, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 143(3). Statutory notices u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) were issued by the AO to the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings. The assessee is a proprietor of M/s. Shakti Construction ,and derives business income from contract work, income from house 2 | P a g e property and income from other sources. The assessee participated

MAHIM PATRAN P. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT -2, AGRA

In the result, the appeals are dismissed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

73,097 Para 7) The revenue's contention that the assessee, instead of claiming the entire TDS amount, ought to have sought a correction of the vendor's mistake, would unnecessarily prolong the entire process of seeking refund based on TDS credit. (Para 10) Parmanand Tiwari Vs. ITO [20151 54 taxinann.com 25 (Kolkata - Trib.) (Copy enclosed) Assessee partner

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

73,649/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 69A for the alleged failure to record the amount in books of account. The supporting evidence has arbitrarily been rejected by the authorities below. Further, section 69A has no application in the facts and circumstances of the case of the appellant. The addition made u/s 69A is wholly illegal which may kindly

ACIT-CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. PUNEET AGARWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

73 of the Judgement Set. Thus, relying upon the above said binding judgments of Apex Court and Jurisdictional High Court and Other High Courts and different Benches of the ITAT, the assessment as framed by the Assessing officer deserves to be quashed. iv). The 2nd ground in assessee’s appeal is with regard to sustaining of addition

ACIT-CIRCEL-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. MAYANK AGRAWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

73 of the Judgement Set. Thus, relying upon the above said binding judgments of Apex Court and Jurisdictional High Court and Other High Courts and different Benches of the ITAT, the assessment as framed by the Assessing officer deserves to be quashed. iv). The 2nd ground in assessee’s appeal is with regard to sustaining of addition

VISHWAMBHAR DAYAL AGARWAL,AGRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

73 of the Judgement Set. Thus, relying upon the above said binding judgments of Apex Court and Jurisdictional High Court and Other High Courts and different Benches of the ITAT, the assessment as framed by the Assessing officer deserves to be quashed. iv). The 2nd ground in assessee’s appeal is with regard to sustaining of addition

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA vs. SH. VISHWAMBHAR DAYAL AGARWAL, AGRA

73 of the Judgement Set.\nThus, relying upon the above said binding judgments of Apex Court and\nJurisdictional High Court and Other High Courts and different Benches of\nthe ITAT, the assessment as framed by the Assessing officer deserves to be\nquashed.\niv). The 2nd ground in assessee's appeal is with regard to sustaining of\naddition