BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai446Delhi431Bangalore142Jaipur141Chandigarh107Hyderabad80Kolkata55Ahmedabad46Raipur33Chennai32Nagpur26Pune25Indore24Guwahati21Lucknow21Surat14SC13Rajkot12Cuttack9Patna8Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur5Agra4Allahabad3Varanasi2Ranchi1Cochin1Amritsar1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 544Section 132(1)3Section 132(4)3Addition to Income3Search & Seizure3Undisclosed Income3Section 1482Section 142(1)2

ALAUDDIN,AGRA vs. ITO, WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 241/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 2(14)Section 250Section 54

x 1024/497 = Rs. 764394/- of property for the year 2014-15. Long Term Capital Gain for 2014-15: Rs. 37,35,606/- 6. However, while giving benefit of deduction claimed by assessee u/s. 54 of the Act from the capital gain of Rs.37,35,606/-, learned Assessing Officer allowed deduction to the extent of Rs.9,31,060/- (sale consideration

VISHWAMBHAR DAYAL AGARWAL,AGRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 330/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

x). Our submissions with regard to non-applicability of statement recorded during search having no evidentiary value has been reproduced at pages 53 to 57 of the CIT(A) order. 14. With this background, each of the ground of appeal in ITA No. 330Agra/2025 is being discussed as under:- i). The first ground of appeal relates to ‘mechanical approval

ACIT-CIRCEL-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. MAYANK AGRAWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 336/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

x). Our submissions with regard to non-applicability of statement recorded during search having no evidentiary value has been reproduced at pages 53 to 57 of the CIT(A) order. 14. With this background, each of the ground of appeal in ITA No. 330Agra/2025 is being discussed as under:- i). The first ground of appeal relates to ‘mechanical approval

ACIT-CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. PUNEET AGARWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 338/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

x). Our submissions with regard to non-applicability of statement recorded during search having no evidentiary value has been reproduced at pages 53 to 57 of the CIT(A) order. 14. With this background, each of the ground of appeal in ITA No. 330Agra/2025 is being discussed as under:- i). The first ground of appeal relates to ‘mechanical approval