BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “house property”+ Long Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai983Delhi758Bangalore298Jaipur204Chennai184Hyderabad172Cochin98Ahmedabad95Kolkata88Pune73Indore70Raipur48Chandigarh42Surat37Nagpur36Patna30Guwahati23Lucknow23Visakhapatnam18SC17Cuttack17Rajkot17Agra10Jodhpur7Amritsar7Allahabad7Ranchi5Dehradun5Jabalpur3Panaji1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 26326Section 5413Section 143(3)9Section 54F7Section 1477Section 1487Addition to Income6House Property5Capital Gains5Section 142(1)

ALAUDDIN,AGRA vs. ITO, WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 241/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 2(14)Section 250Section 54

house” within the meaning of section 54 of the Act, thereby qualifying for exemption of capital gains. Admittedly, the assessee has claimed deduction u/s. 54 of the Act in respect of capital gains arising from the transfer of a long term capital asset on the ground that the assessee had invested in other residential properties

4
Deduction4
Section 2503

YOGENDRA SHARMA,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAH

In the result, the appeal preferred by assessee is allowed

ITA 408/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Yogendra Sharma, I-4695, 2Nd Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Floor, Gali No. 4-B, Balbir Nagar Ward 3(2), Etah. Extension, Shahdara, Delhi. Pan :Cgkps6492J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50C

term capital gains by estimating/substituting the cost of acquisition is bad in law and on facts. The Assessing Officer could not have adopted an estimated cost in place of the Appellant's evidenced cost without any reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under section 55A; mere estimation is impermissible. 8. Because having regard to the facts and circumstances

ACIT 2(1)(1), AGRA vs. MADHUKAR KAPUR, AGRA

The appeal stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 429/AGR/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra23 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No. 429/Agr/2015 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12 ) Acit- 2(1)(1) बनाम/ Shri Madhukar Kapoor Agra. 64, Surya Nagar, Agra. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Acnpk-8849-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Anurag Sinha, Adv. – Ld. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23-04-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Revenue For Assessment Year (Ay) 2011-12 Arises Out Of An Order Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Ii, Agra [Cit(A)] On 26-03-2015 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S. 143(3) Of The Act On 28-02- 2014. The Sole Grievance Of The Revenue Is Qua Grant Of Deduction U/S 54 / 54F. Having Heard Rival Submissions & Upon Perusal Of Case Records, The Appeal Is Adjudicated As Under. 2. In The Assessment Order, Ld. Ao Assessed Capital Gains On Sale Of Certain House Property For Rs.454.98 Lacs Which Was Not Shown By The Assessee In The Return Of Income. The Assessee Sold His 2/3Rd Share Of Land Situated At 5/161, Saunth Ki Mandi, Agra To M/S Mahim Patran Pvt. Ltd. (Mppl) In Which The Assessee Acted As A Director. The Total

For Appellant: Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. CIT-DRFor Respondent: Sh. Anurag Sinha, Adv. – Ld. AR
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)(v)Section 53ASection 54Section 54F

terms of the provision of Sec.53A of Transfer of Property Act, held that the sale of property was completed during this year and the resultant gains would be assessable to capital gains. The assessee explained that the said property was given to MMPL as a tenant since a long time and it continued to be tenant even after the execution

GURDEEP SINGH,AGRA vs. PR.CIT.-1,, AGRA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 31/AGR/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra25 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Shamim Yahya & Shri Anubhav Sharmagurdeep Singh Vs. The Pr. Cit-1 33, Laxmi Nagar, Sikandra, Agra Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282007 Pan No. Aflps 7500 K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Anil Verma, Adv. Revenue By Shri Surendra Pal, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 11.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.10.2023

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 45Section 54F

long term capital asset (not being a residential house), and the assessee has within a period of one year before or two years after the date of transfer, purchased, or has within a period of three years after the date of transfer, constructed, one residential house in India, the capital gain shall not be charged

RENU GOYAL,GWALIOR vs. JCIT- RANGE -2, GWALIOR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/AGR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 250(6)

house property, business & profession, capital gain and income from other sources. She filed her return of income on 29.07.2011, declaring total income at Rs. NIL. The return was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny. Statutory notices u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire were issued

AKHLESH KUMAR TIWARI,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AGRA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 370/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 250(6)Section 54F

long-term capital gain of Rs.7,33,457/-, claiming its deduction u/s. 54F of the Act on the ground that the assessee had invested Rs.25,85,000/- in purchase of new residential property. Case was reopened u/s. 147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s. 148 of the Act, in response to which the assessee filed return of income

SMT. SARIKA SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 56/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

House or the quantum of investment in the same is available on record, and hence excess deduction has been allowed. Not only the deduction was wrongly allowed but also no inquiry was done during the Assessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Perusal of the case record further shows that the Assessee has filed the copy

SHRI ATUL SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 57/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

House or the quantum of investment in the same is available on record, and hence excess deduction has been allowed. Not only the deduction was wrongly allowed but also no inquiry was done during the Assessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Perusal of the case record further shows that the Assessee has filed the copy

LATA SHARMA,AGRA vs. CIT (APPEALS), NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 55/AGR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

Section 144Section 50CSection 54

House No.1121, Ward-2(1)(2), Bassachalu, Tarrakpu Poiya, Vs Agra Agra, Uttar Pradesh-283126 PAN-IBZPS9821M Appellant Respondent Appellant by Shri Gagan Bahgel, Adv. Respondent by Shri Shailender Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 04.04.2025 Date of Pronouncement 04.04.2025 ORDER PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM, This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex-parte order dated

USHA YADAV,ETAWAH vs. ITO 2(2)(5)- ETAWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 431/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2019-20 Usha Yadav Vs. Ito, D/O Shri Ummad Singh Mitra Ward 2(2)(5), Etawah Puram Colony, Bharthana Road, Etawah Pan : Agzpy7652F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Gaurav Goyal, Ca Department By Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 17.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 17.02.2026 Order

Section 148

long term capital gain of Rs 19,90,454. a. That learned CIT(A) (NFAC) has erred in law and facts in sustaining the value of plot at Rs 20,08,000 (circle value) in place of actual sale consideration of Rs 11,30,000 without considering the request of the appellant for verification of value 1 of the said