Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

117 results for “disallowance”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,747 Delhi6,028 Chennai2,505 Kolkata2,360 Bangalore2,269 Ahmedabad1,662 Pune1,382 Jaipur924 Hyderabad894 Chandigarh492 Surat486 Indore469 Visakhapatnam371 Cochin366 Raipur362 Cuttack278 Karnataka277 Rajkot271 Nagpur196 Amritsar194 Lucknow180 Agra117 Guwahati100 Ranchi97 Jodhpur85 Telangana77 SC70 Calcutta65 Panaji62 Patna56 Allahabad50 Dehradun41 Jabalpur40 Varanasi27 Kerala22 Orissa10 Punjab & Haryana7 Himachal Pradesh4 Rajasthan4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 Andhra Pradesh1 Tripura1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income32 Disallowance22 Section 3620 Section 143(3)20 Section 10(38)20 Section 153D16 Section 14714 Section 6813 Section 145(3)12 Section 153A

SATISH PRAKASH AGARWAL,AGRA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 113/AGR/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2016-17

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

disallowance of business loss of Rs.10,06,265/- . The AO did not allow the set off of said losses against

RAVI KUMAR AGARWAL, HUF,AGRA vs. I.T.O.-2(4), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 229/AGR/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra25 Oct 2017AY 2008-09

Shri A. D. Jain

Showing 1–20 of 117 · Page 1 of 6

12

Natural Justice9

Bench:

Section 143(3)

disallowed the expenses claimed in the profit & loss account. By virtue of order dated 17.01.2013, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the asessee’s appeal. The Tribunal, vide his order dated 05.09.2013 (APB, pages 1 to 9), restored the appeal to the Assessing Officer, observing as follows: I.T.A No. 271/Agra/2013 3 “8. On consideration of rival submission

JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,RAJENDRA PARK TIKAMGARH vs. ACIT, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 27/AGR/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra02 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2009-10]

Section 144Section 148

disallowed a sum of Rs.3,60,80,773/-, Rs.1,51,24,131/- and Rs.1,66,59,975/- on account of wrong carry forward losses, which was set

ZILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNA, GUNA

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 348/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

set-off of loss of Rs. 1,20,62,063/-. This case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and accordingly, notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act was issued and served. On perusal of the profit and loss account of the appellant it was seen that the appellant claimed deduction u/s 36 of the Act, for provision

ZILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNA, GUNA

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 347/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

set-off of loss of Rs. 1,20,62,063/-. This case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and accordingly, notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act was issued and served. On perusal of the profit and loss account of the appellant it was seen that the appellant claimed deduction u/s 36 of the Act, for provision

RASHMITA SINGH,GWALIOR vs. ITO, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 293/AGR/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra06 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2009-10] Rashmita Singh, Income Tax Officer, D-47, Phase-3, Garden Homes, Ward-2(3), Alkapuri, Gwalior, Vs Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh-474001 Madhya Pradesh-474001 Pan-Agfps9495J Appellant Respondent

Section 144Section 147Section 148

disallowed a claim of loss of Rs.98,283/- as according to the Assessing Officer, no details/documents were furnished by the assessee to substantiate the loss claimed. 5. Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte as according to him, the case

M/S. KEHETRIYA KISAN GRAMIN BANK , MAINPURI vs. DCIT AO CIRCLE-4(2), FARUKHABAD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 382/AGR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra01 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 36Section 36(1)

set up by the parental Bank. Hence the claim of assessee on account of aggregate advances made by the rural branches is denied. However, deduction to the extent of 7.5% totals provisions for bad and doubtful debts during the year, amounting to Rs.1,11,225/- is being allowed and the remaining amount is added back to the income

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),AGRA, AGRA vs. EMCO EXPORTS, AGRA

In the result, revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 415/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 195Section 250Section 40Section 9

loss account towards the commission paid outside India, further observing that the assessee failed to deduct tax on the above payments as per TDS provisions u/s. 195 of the Act and called for the response of the assessee. Assessee submitted that assessee’s business entails services of foreign commission agents to deal with foreign clients and they have made payments

NARENDRA KUMAR,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-2(2)(1), FIROZABAD, FIROZABAD, U.P.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 88/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Apr 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2021-22]

Section 143(2)Section 144

Disallowance of Rs. 623/- on account of GST late fees. Facts of the Case 2. The assessee, Mr. Narendra Kumar, is engaged in the proprietary business of scrap trading under the name M/s Ayoniza Enterprises. 3. The assessee filed his Income Tax Return (ITR) for AY 2021-22 on 08.10.2021, declaring total income

PRAMOD KUMAR GOYAL,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3) GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 263Section 54B

disallowance of expenses debited in the profit and loss account for want of supportive documentary evidences. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the learned CIT(Appeals) who confirmed the additions made by the learned Assessing Officer and dismissed assessee’s first appeal. 4. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an adjournment application was placed on record

M/S GINNI FILAMENTS LTD.,MATHURA vs. A.C.I.T., RANGE-3, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 173/AGR/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra02 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 234BSection 44A

disallowing deferred revenue expenses amounting to Rs.19,67,582/- without considering the facts that the same was never claimed in earlier years by the assessee and the same is being partly claimed on year to year basis in part and is being allowed accordingly consistently. 7. BECAUSE, on due consideration of facts and in the overall circumstances of the case

SHARDA OIL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,AGRA vs. JURISDICTIONAL OFFICER,CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 62/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 Sharda Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jo Circle-2(1)(1), 17, Tundla Road, Nunhai Agrau.P. Agrau.P. Pan: Aaecs1396L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Prem Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jo Dcit/Acit, Circle-1(1) Kanwal Complex, B-32, A.G. Office Gwalior M.P. Road, Gwalior M.P. 474001 Pan: Aabcp2035Q (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Karam Udyog Vs. Jo Circle - 1(1)(1) 9, Gailana Road Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Abbfk0897L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)Section 438Section 43B

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

KARAM UDHOG,AGRA vs. J.A.O., DY. CIT.., CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 112/AGR/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 Sharda Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jo Circle-2(1)(1), 17, Tundla Road, Nunhai Agrau.P. Agrau.P. Pan: Aaecs1396L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Prem Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jo Dcit/Acit, Circle-1(1) Kanwal Complex, B-32, A.G. Office Gwalior M.P. Road, Gwalior M.P. 474001 Pan: Aabcp2035Q (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Karam Udyog Vs. Jo Circle - 1(1)(1) 9, Gailana Road Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Abbfk0897L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)Section 438Section 43B

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

PREM MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED ,GWALIOR vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER ,DCIT/ACIT,CIRCLE1(1), GWALIOR

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 100/AGR/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 Sharda Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jo Circle-2(1)(1), 17, Tundla Road, Nunhai Agrau.P. Agrau.P. Pan: Aaecs1396L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Prem Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jo Dcit/Acit, Circle-1(1) Kanwal Complex, B-32, A.G. Office Gwalior M.P. Road, Gwalior M.P. 474001 Pan: Aabcp2035Q (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Karam Udyog Vs. Jo Circle - 1(1)(1) 9, Gailana Road Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Abbfk0897L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)Section 438Section 43B

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

AMAR SHOE & LEATHER WEARS,AGRA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 91/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Krishna Kanha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit Circle – 2(1)(2) Pushpanjali Palace Delhi Gate Sanjay Place, Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Aacck7160L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Banmoreelecticals Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit Behind Park Hotel, Moti Mahal, Road City Centre Gwalior M.P. Gwalior M.P. Pan: Aabcb4242M (Respondent) (Appellant)

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

M/S RADISH TECHNOLOGIES,ALIGARH vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), ALIGARH

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 92/AGR/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Krishna Kanha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit Circle – 2(1)(2) Pushpanjali Palace Delhi Gate Sanjay Place, Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Aacck7160L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Banmoreelecticals Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit Behind Park Hotel, Moti Mahal, Road City Centre Gwalior M.P. Gwalior M.P. Pan: Aabcb4242M (Respondent) (Appellant)

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

M/S GLOBAL POLYMERS, ,AGRA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 93/AGR/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Krishna Kanha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit Circle – 2(1)(2) Pushpanjali Palace Delhi Gate Sanjay Place, Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Aacck7160L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Banmoreelecticals Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit Behind Park Hotel, Moti Mahal, Road City Centre Gwalior M.P. Gwalior M.P. Pan: Aabcb4242M (Respondent) (Appellant)

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

ASHIRWAD FOOD AND BEVERAGES ,BHIND vs. J.A.O., DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GWALIOR

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 119/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Krishna Kanha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit Circle – 2(1)(2) Pushpanjali Palace Delhi Gate Sanjay Place, Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Aacck7160L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Banmoreelecticals Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit Behind Park Hotel, Moti Mahal, Road City Centre Gwalior M.P. Gwalior M.P. Pan: Aabcb4242M (Respondent) (Appellant)

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

PREM VEHICLES PVT. LTD. ,AGRA vs. J.A.O., WARD-2(1)(5), AGRA

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 118/AGR/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Krishna Kanha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit Circle – 2(1)(2) Pushpanjali Palace Delhi Gate Sanjay Place, Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Aacck7160L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Banmoreelecticals Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit Behind Park Hotel, Moti Mahal, Road City Centre Gwalior M.P. Gwalior M.P. Pan: Aabcb4242M (Respondent) (Appellant)

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that

PREM AUTO ENTERPRISES,AGRA vs. J.A.O., DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result all the appeals filed by the

ITA 117/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Krishna Kanha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit Circle – 2(1)(2) Pushpanjali Palace Delhi Gate Sanjay Place, Agra U.P. Agra U.P. Pan: Aacck7160L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Banmoreelecticals Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit Behind Park Hotel, Moti Mahal, Road City Centre Gwalior M.P. Gwalior M.P. Pan: Aabcb4242M (Respondent) (Appellant)

loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely: (i) (ii) .. (iii) ........ (iv) disallowance of expenditure indicated in the Audit Report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return; This shows that CPC is within the power to make such adjustment as Appellant's auditor himself has indicated in the tax audit report that