BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi123Mumbai95Jaipur75Bangalore38Hyderabad31Ahmedabad29Chennai25Kolkata22Chandigarh21Pune17Lucknow15Cochin13Indore13Raipur10Amritsar10Surat10Nagpur6Cuttack5Patna5Telangana5Agra4Jodhpur3Visakhapatnam3Karnataka2Ranchi2Varanasi2Allahabad2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 686Section 80C6Section 1446Section 271A6Cash Deposit4Addition to Income4Section 153A3Section 143(2)3Penalty3Section 250

GUFRANUL HASSAN,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 2(3)(1) JHANSI, JHANSI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 378/AGR/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Feb 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Gufranul Hassan, Vs. Ito, D-4, Afzal Apartment, Ward-2(3)(1), Sir Syed Nagar, Jhansi Aligharh, Up 202 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aalph1367A Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 07/02/2025

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 80CSection 80G

disallowance made on account of investments made under Section 80C to Section 80GG of the Act for Rs 7,94,500/- in the facts

B K KESHARWANI, AGRA vs. MADHUR MITTAL, AGRA

2
Section 69A2
Disallowance2

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 536/AGR/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Apr 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Ld Cit(A), Who Partly Allowed

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 80C

disallowance of Rs. 1,00,000/- u/s. 80C of the Act. 6. Aggrieved revenue has filed this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. That the Ld.CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of Rs.2,43,07,000 made by the A.O on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA vs. ADITYA PANDEY, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

ITA 383/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra08 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 69ASection 80C

disallowed Rs.2,00,000/- u/s. 80C & 80D of the Act. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act were also initiated against the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred first appeal before Ld. CIT(Appeals). Learned CIT(Appeals) found that the appellant assessee is a salaried person and was working as Executive Engineer of EDD-II, Ghazipur(PVVNL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA vs. ADITY PANDEY, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

ITA 384/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra08 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 69ASection 80C

disallowed Rs.2,00,000/- u/s. 80C & 80D of the Act. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act were also initiated against the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred first appeal before Ld. CIT(Appeals). Learned CIT(Appeals) found that the appellant assessee is a salaried person and was working as Executive Engineer of EDD-II, Ghazipur(PVVNL