BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi100Mumbai69Jaipur53Bangalore35Hyderabad25Chennai18Ahmedabad17Kolkata17Pune16Lucknow15Chandigarh15Cochin13Raipur8Indore7Amritsar7Surat6Patna5Nagpur5Agra4Cuttack4Visakhapatnam3Jodhpur3Rajkot1Ranchi1Panaji1Varanasi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 1446Section 271A6Addition to Income4Section 80C3Cash Deposit3Section 2502Section 143(2)2Section 69A2Disallowance2Penalty

GUFRANUL HASSAN,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 2(3)(1) JHANSI, JHANSI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 378/AGR/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Feb 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Gufranul Hassan, Vs. Ito, D-4, Afzal Apartment, Ward-2(3)(1), Sir Syed Nagar, Jhansi Aligharh, Up 202 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aalph1367A Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 07/02/2025

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 80CSection 80G

disallowance made on account of investments made under Section 80C to Section 80GG of the Act for Rs 7,94,500/- in the facts

PAWAN KUMAR CHAUHAN,MAINPURI vs. ITO- WARD 2 (5) , AGRA, AGRA

2
ITA 162/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2012-13
Section 147Section 250(6)Section 80

disallowance made of deduction u/s. 80C of the Act of Rs.1,00,000/-\nand direct the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee its claim of\ndeduction u/s. 80C of the Act.\n7. Appeal of the assessee accordingly stands allowed in the above\nterms.\nOrder pronounced in the open court on 16.04.2025.\nSd/-\n(SUNIL KUMAR SINGH)\nJUDICIAL MEMBER

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA vs. ADITYA PANDEY, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

ITA 383/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra08 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 69ASection 80C

disallowed Rs.2,00,000/- u/s. 80C & 80D of the Act. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act were also initiated against the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred first appeal before Ld. CIT(Appeals). Learned CIT(Appeals) found that the appellant assessee is a salaried person and was working as Executive Engineer of EDD-II, Ghazipur(PVVNL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA vs. ADITY PANDEY, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

ITA 384/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra08 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 69ASection 80C

disallowed Rs.2,00,000/- u/s. 80C & 80D of the Act. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act were also initiated against the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred first appeal before Ld. CIT(Appeals). Learned CIT(Appeals) found that the appellant assessee is a salaried person and was working as Executive Engineer of EDD-II, Ghazipur(PVVNL