BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 36(1)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai327Chennai155Delhi134Bangalore128Cochin92Pune58Kolkata52Hyderabad29Visakhapatnam28Jaipur28Indore23Cuttack23Surat22Amritsar20Chandigarh16Nagpur16Karnataka16Ahmedabad14Rajkot13Jodhpur9Patna9Kerala7Guwahati7Jabalpur5SC4Telangana4Agra3Lucknow3Allahabad2Ranchi1Raipur1Panaji1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 368Section 143(2)3Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 143(3)2Section 36(1)(viia)2Exemption2Carry Forward of Losses2

M/S. KEHETRIYA KISAN GRAMIN BANK , MAINPURI vs. DCIT AO CIRCLE-4(2), FARUKHABAD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 382/AGR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra01 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 36Section 36(1)

section 36 (viia) on the basis of advances given by the rural I.T.A No. 382/Agra/2017 3 branches. The AO restricted the deduction to 7.5% of the total provisions of debt and doubtful debt. Thus, only an amount of Rs. 1,11,225/- was allowed and the remaining deduction was added back. Thus, the assessment was completed at total income

ZILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNA, GUNA

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 348/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
27 Feb 2026
AY 2017-18

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

section 250 of the Act, wherein Ld. CIT(A) has partly allowed/dismissed assessee’sappeals respectively. 2. At the very outset, it is noticed that both the appeals are time-barred by 39-40 days respectively. Delay condonation applications on behalf of Smt. RoshaniRaghuvanshi, staff member of the appellant are on record. The cause for the delay shown, is that

ZILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNA, GUNA

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 347/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

section 250 of the Act, wherein Ld. CIT(A) has partly allowed/dismissed assessee’sappeals respectively. 2. At the very outset, it is noticed that both the appeals are time-barred by 39-40 days respectively. Delay condonation applications on behalf of Smt. RoshaniRaghuvanshi, staff member of the appellant are on record. The cause for the delay shown, is that