BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,242Mumbai802Kolkata535Bangalore430Chennai401Jaipur300Pune289Ahmedabad215Chandigarh143Hyderabad139Raipur121Indore82Lucknow59Guwahati43Surat31Visakhapatnam28Jodhpur28Cochin26Amritsar23Nagpur18Cuttack18Rajkot17Karnataka14Jabalpur11Patna9Ranchi8Panaji7Dehradun7Varanasi6SC5Telangana4Agra3Rajasthan3Calcutta2Allahabad1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)7Section 362Disallowance2Addition to Income2

GOVIND AGARWAL, GWALIOR,GWALIOR vs. DCIT- CIRCLE 2(1), GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 65/AGR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance of delayed payment of employees’s contribution towards PF/ESI by invoking the provisions of section 36(1)(va) read

ASHOKA GENERAL INDUSTRIES,MATHURA vs. JURISDICTIONAL A.O., WARD-1(3)(1), MATHURA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 25/AGR/2022[2019]Status: HeardITAT Agra09 Nov 2023

Bench: Due Date Of Filing Of Return. The Impugned Order Is Grossly Arbitrary, Highly Unjust, Unwarranted, Perverse, Wrong, Illegal & Bad In Law.

Section 143(1)Section 36Section 438

1. BECAUSE, upon due consideration of facts and in the overall circumstances of the case the NFAC was highly unjustified in confirming disallowance of Rs.6,14,929/- in respect of payment against Employees Contribution to Provident Fund/ ESI deposited during the Financial Year itself before due date of filing of Return. The impugned order is grossly arbitrary, highly unjust, unwarranted

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, MORENA vs. SHRI AGRASEN LOGISTICS, JOTAI ROAD, PORSA,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 108/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra24 Jun 2025AY 2022-23
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

Va. Precision Finance (P)\nLtd. reported in 208 ITR 405/(1995) 82 Taxman 31 vide order dated 14.06.1983. Copy\nplaced at pages 36 to 38 of judgement set\nvii). Judgment of Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Rajshree Synthetics (P) Itd.\nVs. CIT reported in (2003) 131 Taxman 391 (Raj) vide order dated 08.11.2001, Copy\nplaced