BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,601Delhi1,280Bangalore717Chennai491Kolkata448Jaipur187Hyderabad184Ahmedabad171Raipur124Pune106Surat99Chandigarh60Karnataka56Rajkot47Indore45Lucknow36Cochin30Amritsar27Panaji26Visakhapatnam25Cuttack25Nagpur25Jodhpur22Telangana16Ranchi11SC10Dehradun10Patna9Guwahati8Agra6Punjab & Haryana6Jabalpur5Kerala5Allahabad3Varanasi3Calcutta2Rajasthan2Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 405Addition to Income5Section 1954Disallowance4Section 93Section 194C3Section 201(1)3TDS3Section 2632Section 143(3)

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),AGRA, AGRA vs. EMCO EXPORTS, AGRA

In the result, revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 415/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 195Section 250Section 40Section 9

201(1A) to pay simple interest at 12 per cent per annum on the amount of such tax from the date on which such tax was deductible to the date on which such tax is actually paid. The most important expression in Section 195(1) consists of the words “chargeable under the provisions of the Act”. A person paying interest

GRAM VIKAS KALYAN SANSTHAN,MATHURA vs. I.T.O. (TDS), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

2
Section 143(2)2
Deduction2
ITA 30/AGR/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
28 Oct 2025
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhgram Vikas Kalyan Sansthan, Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds), Nagla Aklha, Sonkh – Goverdhan Road, Agra. Mathura – 281 123 (Uttar Pradesh). (Pan : Aaatg3272E) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajan Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Shri Shalenndra Shrivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.10.2025 Date Of Order : 28.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shalenndra Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

201 (1)/(1A) of the Income tax act. Thus the stand of the AO is hereby confirmed and the total demand raised of rupees 7,50,231/- by treating the assessee as assessee in default for not deducting TDS under section 194C is hereby confirmed.” 7. Aggrieved assessee is in appeal before us raising following grounds of appeal :- “1. Since

PRAGATI SINGH,GWALIOR vs. CIT, AAYKAR BHAVAN GWALIOR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed in the above terms

ITA 174/AGR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra02 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year:2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) is illegal, unjustified and bad in law.” 3. The solitary issue in the present appeal relates to addition made to the income of the assessee of Rs.2,74,978/- u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source. A perusal of the order of the Assessing Officer reveals the assessee

HARDAYAL MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SHIKOHABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), FIROZABAD, FIROZABAD

In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is partly

ITA 342/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(2)Section 145(3)

201 ITR 674 (Kar) held that the Assessing Officer’s powers under the Section are not arbitrary and he must exercise his discretion and judgment judicially. CIT Vs. Surjeet Singh Mahesh Kumar (1994) 210 ITR 83 (All) held that in every case of Best Judgement, the element of guess work cannot be eliminated so long as best judgement

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA vs. CHITAVALSAH JUTE MILLS LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 99/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh(Through Virtual Hearing) Acit, Vs. Chitavalasah Jute Mills Ltd, Range-1, 73-74, 201, Sheetala House, Faridabad Nehru Place, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccc6834D Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 15/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/12/2025

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR
Section 144Section 271D

201, Sheetala House, Faridabad Nehru Place, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AACCC6834D Assessee by : None Revenue by: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR Date of Hearing 15/09/2025 Date of pronouncement 04/12/2025 O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: 1. The appeal in ITA No. 99/AGR/2025 for AY 2012-13, arises out of the order of the National

GUNJAN GUPTA,NOIDA vs. PR.CIT-1, AGRA

In the result, this appeal filed by assessee stands dismissed

ITA 34/AGR/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra08 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Shamim Yahya & Shri Yogesh Kumar Usgunjan Gupta Vs. Pr. Cit A-45, Sector – 26 Agra - 1 Noda – 201 301, Uttar Pradesh Pan No. Abupg 5419 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By -None- Revenue By Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav- Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 06.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.12.2023

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

201 301, Uttar Pradesh PAN No. ABUPG 5419 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by -None- Revenue by Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav- CIT(D.R.) Date of hearing: 06.12.2023 Date of Pronouncement: 08.12.2023 PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) - 1, Agra dated 24.03.2021 pertaining to Assessment