BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 156clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,136Delhi973Bangalore284Chennai265Kolkata220Ahmedabad136Pune116Hyderabad106Jaipur104Raipur95Chandigarh77Cochin72Surat57Panaji47Calcutta38Indore34Lucknow33Rajkot22SC21Nagpur20Allahabad17Ranchi15Karnataka15Visakhapatnam13Cuttack13Varanasi13Amritsar8Kerala5Jabalpur5Agra3Punjab & Haryana2Patna2Himachal Pradesh2Telangana2Dehradun2Rajasthan1Gauhati1Jodhpur1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Section 2502Section 254(2)2Section 102Disallowance2

HARDAYAL MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SHIKOHABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), FIROZABAD, FIROZABAD

In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is partly

ITA 342/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(2)Section 145(3)

disallowable item of expenditure, etc. Therefore, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the book results were rejected by the Assessing Officer on insignificant grounds. DCIT v. Hanuman Sugar (Khandsari) Mills (P.) Ltd. [2014] 221 Taxman 156 (Allahabad) the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court approving the decision of the lower authorities affirmed that, the assessee cannot be penalized, especially

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, MORENA vs. SHRI AGRASEN LOGISTICS, JOTAI ROAD, PORSA,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 108/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
24 Jun 2025
AY 2022-23
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

disallowed interest claimed/paid in relation\nto those credits in assessment year under consideration or even in subsequent assessment\nyears, and tax at source had been deducted out of interest paid/credited to creditors,\nTribunal was justified in deleting addition made - Held, yes - Whether as there was no\nsubstance in appeal and no substantial question of law arose, appeal was liable

M/S SATYAM SOLUTIONS LTD,GWALIOR vs. DCIT/ACIT1(1), , GWALIOR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 167/AGR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 10Section 143(1)Section 250Section 254(2)

disallowance of employees’ contribution towards Provident Fund (PF) and Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) was covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. vs. CIT (2022) 143 taxmann.com 178 (SC). Subsequently, the assessee filed an application under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking recall of the said order dated