BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 155clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai954Delhi931Bangalore250Chennai249Ahmedabad177Kolkata152Jaipur117Cochin78Surat64Hyderabad64Pune61Raipur54Allahabad49Rajkot43Lucknow37Calcutta37Chandigarh35Indore27Cuttack25Nagpur17SC14Jodhpur12Karnataka11Visakhapatnam7Jabalpur7Guwahati6Telangana5Amritsar5Varanasi4Agra3Panaji3Dehradun1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 194C3Section 201(1)2Section 1442Disallowance2

GRAM VIKAS KALYAN SANSTHAN,MATHURA vs. I.T.O. (TDS), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 30/AGR/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhgram Vikas Kalyan Sansthan, Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds), Nagla Aklha, Sonkh – Goverdhan Road, Agra. Mathura – 281 123 (Uttar Pradesh). (Pan : Aaatg3272E) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajan Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Shri Shalenndra Shrivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.10.2025 Date Of Order : 28.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shalenndra Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

155/- with one bill of Rs.30,515 and another of Rs.7,640/-. 9.2 Even in this context, the provisions of this section are very clear. Subsection 5 of section 194 lays down :- (5) No deduction shall be made from the amount of any sum credited or paid are likely to be credited or paid to the account

AMAR SHOE AND LEATHER WEARS,AGRA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA

Appeal is allowed in very terms

ITA 93/AGR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra13 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that there arises the first and foremost issue of validity of impugned assessment order dated 30.12.2017 itself once it was an instance of “limited scrutiny” on various issues whereas

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 131/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250

155 taxmann.com 580 (Calcutta) HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA (CLPB-\n1-4)\nii) Sukhdham Infrastructures LLP v. Income-tax Officer* [2024] 165\ntaxmann.com 154 (Kolkata - Trib.) IN THE ITAT KOLKATA BENCH 'B' (CLPB\n5-5)\niii) VUDATHA VANI RAO v. Income-tax Officer* [2024] 159 taxmann.com\n1394 (Visakhapatnam - Trib.) IN THE ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH 'SMC'\n(CLPB 6-8)\niv) Urban