INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, MORENA vs. SHRI AGRASEN LOGISTICS, JOTAI ROAD, PORSA,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

d. Written submission filed before the worthy CITIA) taken grounds under on If the assessee has discharged his onus by way of providing each and every documents then the burden of verifying be in hands of Assessing Officer. No material on record have been produced by the Ld. AO before taking adverse action against loans taken by the assessee

GIRDHARI LAL KEDAR NATH SINGHAL,AGRA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahmangirdhari Lal Kedar Nath Singhal, Vs. Ito 1 (1)(1), Ff – 1, Bhagwati Complex, Agra. M.G. Road, Opp. Shah Cinema, Agra – 282 002 (Uttar Pradesh). (Pan : Aacfg5458N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Naveen Garg, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2025 Date Of Order : 03.09.2025

D E R 1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Chandigarh [“Ld. JCIT”, for short] dated 04.02.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief facts of the case are, assessee, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for the AY 2017-18 declaring total income of Rs.5

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S PREM MOTORS PVT LTD., GWALIOR

The appeals of the department are dismissed

D E R The impugned judgment and order dated 11.05.2011 has relied upon a judgment of the same date by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in ITA No. 462 of 2009. Having perused the judgment and having heard arguments, we are of the view that the judgment is a detailed judgment going into Section

HMA AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED,AGRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA, AGRA

In the result, ground no.1 raised by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhhma Agro Industries Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, 2/220, 2Nd Floor, Glory Plaza, Agra. Opp. Soor Sadan, M.G. Road, Agra – 282 002. (Pan :Aacch0450J)

d) Computation of income of the assessee. e) Details of transaction made by assessee with Md. Irfan S/o Meherban i.e. Details of purchase made by the assessee, copy of invoices, transportation slips, weight slips and relevant extract of bank statements highlighting the transaction made by the assessee with regards to purchases made from Sh. Irfan. 8 ITA No.251/Agr/2025

ACIT, CC, AGRA, AGRA vs. HMA AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED,, AGRA

In the result, ground no.1 raised by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhhma Agro Industries Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, 2/220, 2Nd Floor, Glory Plaza, Agra. Opp. Soor Sadan, M.G. Road, Agra – 282 002. (Pan :Aacch0450J)

d) Computation of income of the assessee. e) Details of transaction made by assessee with Md. Irfan S/o Meherban i.e. Details of purchase made by the assessee, copy of invoices, transportation slips, weight slips and relevant extract of bank statements highlighting the transaction made by the assessee with regards to purchases made from Sh. Irfan. 8 ITA No.251/Agr/2025

ACIT, CC, AGRA, AGRA vs. HMA AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED,, AGRA

In the result, ground no.1 raised by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhhma Agro Industries Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, 2/220, 2Nd Floor, Glory Plaza, Agra. Opp. Soor Sadan, M.G. Road, Agra – 282 002. (Pan :Aacch0450J)

d) Computation of income of the assessee. e) Details of transaction made by assessee with Md. Irfan S/o Meherban i.e. Details of purchase made by the assessee, copy of invoices, transportation slips, weight slips and relevant extract of bank statements highlighting the transaction made by the assessee with regards to purchases made from Sh. Irfan. 8 ITA No.251/Agr/2025

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in the terms indicated

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

131 of the Act, more particularly when specific request with regard thereto has been made by the assessee. 3. That the learned CIT(A)-I, Agra has erred both in law and on facts in upholding the rejection of the books of accounts by invoking the provisions laid down under section 145(3) of the Act and estimation

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in the terms indicated

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

131 of the Act, more particularly when specific request with regard thereto has been made by the assessee. 3. That the learned CIT(A)-I, Agra has erred both in law and on facts in upholding the rejection of the books of accounts by invoking the provisions laid down under section 145(3) of the Act and estimation

AMBRISH SARIN,AGRA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

D. M. Brothers (2010) 44 DTR 0013 (All) b) CIT vs. Target Construction Co. Ltd. (2015) 55 taxmann.com 294 (All) c) Pragati Engineering Corporation vs. ITO (Order dated 5.04.2013 passed by Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in ITA No. 11/2012). 8. As per CBDT Instructions (APB. Pg. 2-3) the cases selected under limited scrutiny, if the Assessing Officer