BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 40A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai512Delhi360Bangalore141Ahmedabad113Chennai98Raipur95Kolkata85Pune67Jaipur66Amritsar53Hyderabad50Chandigarh47Visakhapatnam37Surat36Indore15Rajkot12Guwahati10Lucknow9Cuttack9Cochin9Jodhpur6Karnataka5Varanasi5Ranchi3SC3Patna3Agra3Calcutta2Dehradun2Nagpur2Allahabad1Telangana1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 133(6)2Section 40A(3)2Disallowance2

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA, AGRA vs. ALNOOR EXPORTS, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 273/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh**

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)

2)(b) of the Act. Accordingly, the Ground Nos. 4 and 5 raised by the revenue are dismissed. - 13. The Ground No. 6 raised by the revenue is general in nature and does not require any specific adjudication. - 14. In the result, the appeal of the revenue for Assessment Year 2015-16 is dismissed. # **ITA No 274/AGR/2024 – Assessment Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA, AGRA vs. ALNOOR EXPORTS, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 274/AGR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)

2)(b) of the Act. Accordingly, the Ground Nos. 4 and 5 raised by the revenue are dismissed. 13. The Ground No. 6 raised by the revenue is general in nature and does not require any specific adjudication. 14. In the result, the appeal of the revenue for Assessment Year 2015-16 is dismissed. ITA No 274/AGR/2024 – Assessment Year

M/S SHRI KAILA DEVI ICE & COLD STORAGE,AGRA vs. I.T.O.-4(4), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 181/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Feb 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshm/S Shri Kaila Devi Ice & Cold Vs. Income Tax Officer, Storage Ward-4(4), 19-20, Adesh Nagar, Sheetla Agra Road, Khandari, Agra. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aazfs2787H Assessee By : Shri Rajesh Malhotra, Ca Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 22/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 03/02/2026

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Malhotra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

40A(3) and adverse conclusion drawn to justify the net profit rate of 25% is unjust, illegal and arbitrary. 8. That the appellant craves to add or alter any other ground of appeal as may be warranted.” 3. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee is a partnership firm engaged