BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 115clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai808Delhi637Bangalore257Chennai125Kolkata119Ahmedabad106Hyderabad59Jaipur47Chandigarh39Raipur31Ranchi28Pune26Guwahati19Lucknow18Surat15Nagpur15Karnataka15Indore13Visakhapatnam12Cuttack12Rajkot10SC9Telangana8Amritsar7Dehradun4Cochin4Agra2Calcutta2Panaji2Patna2Orissa1Kerala1Jodhpur1Gauhati1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Disallowance2Addition to Income2

HARDAYAL MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SHIKOHABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), FIROZABAD, FIROZABAD

In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is partly

ITA 342/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(2)Section 145(3)

depreciation disallowance on fixed assets. The perusal of the impugned assessment order would reveal that the ld. Assessing Officer while considering the net profit rate of the assessee has given a comparative analysis of the turnover and profits of the appellant for the three assessment years as under: A.Y. Sales (Rs.) GP (Rs) G.P. Rate NP(Rs.) N.P. Rate

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 216/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra
17 May 2021
AY 2011-12
Section 124Section 142Section 153

depreciation claimed on the ADA building which includes the cost of land. (xiv) That, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law & on facts by deleting the addition of Rs.15,08, 159/-, on account of house tax and water tax payable, without appreciating the fact of the case that house tax and water tax were neither paid in that year