BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi26Chennai13Jaipur12Mumbai9Bangalore7Lucknow7Kolkata7Surat4Hyderabad4Rajkot3Chandigarh3Agra3Pune3Indore2Cuttack2Jodhpur1Cochin1Patna1Amritsar1Raipur1Allahabad1Ahmedabad1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 1445Depreciation3Section 143(2)2Section 142(1)2Cash Deposit2Demonetization2Addition to Income2

MOHD SAGIR,ALIGARH vs. ACIT CIRCLE 4(1)(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal for the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 10/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra01 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2017-18]

Section 142(1)Section 142(3)Section 143(2)Section 144

Depreciation of Rs.5,55,0000/- III. Cash deposits during the demonetization period Rs.2,07,00,000/- 4. Aggrieved with the said

MAHAMAYA BOORA UDYOG,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(2), AGRA, AGRA

The appeal stands partly allowed

ITA 6/AGR/2024[2017-2018]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
12 Feb 2025
AY 2017-2018

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.6/Agr/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Mahamaya Boora Udyog Ito Ward 2(1)(2) बनाम/ 15/469, Kali Bari Road Agra Vs. Noori Darwaja, Agra – 282 003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaxfm-1475-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Gaurav Goyal (Ca) – Ld. Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Shailendra Shrivastava – Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12-02-2025

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Goyal (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Shailendra Shrivastava – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 144Section 69A

demonetization period was to be considered as normal business receipts and similar rate of 8% would apply on the same. 4. On the rate of profit, the assessee furnished comparative chart which is extracted on Page No.14 of the impugned order. It could be seen that the assessee reflected net profit before depreciation

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 131/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250

Depreciation Expenses, Dress Expenses, Employee\nProvident Fund, Employee State insurance, Rebate & Discount, Rent\nExpenses, Staff Salaries Expenses.\n7. BECAUSE, the Ld. \"CIT(A)' before dismissing the appeal on the\nground that appellant failed to furnish any documentary evidence with\nregard to the expenses claimed by him, ought to have provided\nopportunity of hearing to the appellant to put forth