KRIPA RAM VYAS,GWALIOR vs. ITO, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Kripa Ram Vyas, Vs. Ito, Pgv College, Jiwaji Gwalior Ganj, Lashkar Ho, Gird, Gwalior -474001 Pan: Abupv2129C Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12/09/2025

condone the delay in filing appeal and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. 3. The main grievance of the assessee is that orders have been passed by the both the lower authorities by violating the principles of natural justice by not affording sufficient opportunity. None appeared on behalf of the assessee before me. I find that the assessee

VINEETA DEVI,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAWAH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2019-20]

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case:- The assessee is an individual assessee and had not filed her return of income for A.Y.2019-20. The Assessing Officer received information through Insight Portal of the Department that for the Assessment Year 2019-20 the assessee had purchased an immovable property for Rs.1

SMT MEERA DEVI ,AURAIYA vs. ITO W1(1)(4), ETAWAH

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

delay of 311 days in filing all the assessee’s instant appeals is condoned in light of larger interest of justice as well as in light of Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC). 3. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from Revenue side that the assessee has filed

SMT MEERA KUMARI,2010-11 vs. ITO 1(1)(4), ETAWAH

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

delay of 311 days in filing all the assessee’s instant appeals is condoned in light of larger interest of justice as well as in light of Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC). 3. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from Revenue side that the assessee has filed

SMT MEERA KUMARE,AURAIYA vs. ITO 1(1)(4), ETAWAH

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

delay of 311 days in filing all the assessee’s instant appeals is condoned in light of larger interest of justice as well as in light of Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC). 3. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from Revenue side that the assessee has filed

GORA BAI SAHU ,ASHOK NAGAR vs. ITO ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13] Gora Bai Sahu, Income Tax Officer, Shri Ram Charan Sahu & Ashok Nagar, L/H Late Gora Bai, Sony Vs Madhya Pradesh-473331 Colony, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh-473331 Pan-Fdzps8877N Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Pankaj Gargh, Adv. Respondent By Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 17.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 15.09.2025 Order

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case:- This case was reopened u/s 148 of the Act vide noticed dated 28.03.2019 on the basis of AIR information of purchasing immovable property having value more than Rs. 30,00,000/-. The legal heir of the assessee Shri Ramcharan Lal Sahu filed the return