BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 9(1)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai541Mumbai430Delhi424Pune303Kolkata263Ahmedabad198Bangalore189Jaipur155Karnataka141Hyderabad137Chandigarh121Nagpur99Raipur95Surat93Cuttack64Amritsar63Indore60Lucknow56Cochin55Visakhapatnam47Panaji46Rajkot40Calcutta38SC20Guwahati15Jodhpur14Patna13Varanasi10Telangana10Agra9Allahabad6Dehradun6Rajasthan4Jabalpur3Orissa3Ranchi3Himachal Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Kerala2Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)10Section 234C7Section 1546Section 12A6Section 2715Section 50C4Section 12A(1)(ac)4Section 1483Addition to Income

AARA AGRO PVT. LTD.,AGRA vs. DY.CIT., CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra23 Nov 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenalt.A No. 54/Agr/2021 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) Vs. Cit Circle-2 (1)(1) Agra Agro Private Limited Agra U.P. Anjana Cinema, 3/2 D.M.G. Road Agra U.P. 282007 Pan: Aagca8595F (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 207Section 234BSection 234C

9 JUNE 2019. THE RECTIFICATION ORDER RECEIVED ON EMAIL ON 21 FEB 2020 SEEN ON 2/3/2020. THE APPEAL FILED IS DELAYED BY 275 DAYS FOR WHICH SEPERATE APPLICATION IS BEING FILED." During the appellate proceedings the appellant submitted the written 3. submission, produced here under: "The appeal filed is delayed by 275 days for which separate application for condonation

3
TDS3
Rectification u/s 1542
Long Term Capital Gains2

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 70/AGR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. The following grounds have been raised: “1. Because the Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly and illegally confirmed the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(l)(c) of the I. T. Act. 2. Because the assessee duly discharged her onus of proving the cash credits to be genuine. The addition

PRIYAVRAT SHARMA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 355/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 50C

delay caused in filing this second appeal stands condoned. 3. The brief facts state that the appellant assessee filed his return of Income for the year under consideration, declaring total Income at Rs. 5,24,040/- and worked out long term capital gain/loss of (-) 2,72,271/- on sale of two plots of land as under. 1) Land 03/12/2018 Value

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

ITA 267/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

delay stands condoned. 3. Since, the facts and issue involved in both these appeals are similar, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts of ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 are only being narrated as under. ITA No. 266/Agr/2025: 4. Brief facts state that assessee filed

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

ITA 266/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

delay stands condoned. 3. Since, the facts and issue involved in both these appeals are similar, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts of ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 are only being narrated as under. ITA No. 266/Agr/2025: 4. Brief facts state that assessee filed

STATE BANK OF INDIA,GWALIOR vs. CIT A , GWALIOR

In the result, ITA No.42/Agr/2018 is allowed for statistical

ITA 6/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra31 May 2018AY 2013-14

condoned accordingly. 4. Since a common issue is involved in all these appeals relating to levy of late filing fee u/s 234E of the Act, they are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 5. In these cases, the appellants have deposited TDS in Central Government account as per TDS provisions of the Act. They

STATE BANK OF INDIA,GWALIOR vs. CIT A, GWALIOR

In the result, ITA No.42/Agr/2018 is allowed for statistical

ITA 3/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra31 May 2018AY 2013-14

condoned accordingly. 4. Since a common issue is involved in all these appeals relating to levy of late filing fee u/s 234E of the Act, they are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 5. In these cases, the appellants have deposited TDS in Central Government account as per TDS provisions of the Act. They

NAVIN CHAND,AGRA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2(1), AGRA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed our direction

ITA 357/AGR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Oct 2019AY 2008-09
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154

VI-A of Rs. 1,04,768/- without appreciating the fact of the case and against the principal of natural justice 4) That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the impugned assessment order u/s 154 of the learned ACIT without giving proper opportunity of being heard

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASHOKNAGAR vs. AJIT SINGH , SHIVPURI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 89/AGR/2025[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh (Through Virtual Hearing) Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ajit Singh, Ashoknagar, Village-Haatodh, Madhya Pradesh Post-Kota, Shivpuri (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Ccnps7470K Assessee By : Shri Vipin Upadhyay, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 17/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/11/2025

For Appellant: Shri Vipin Upadhyay, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT(DR)
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148(1)

condone the delay in the interest of substantial justice and admit the appeal of the revenue for adjudication. 3. The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned NFAC was justified in treating the assessment order framed by the Learned Ajit Singh Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) as non-est in the facts and circumstances