BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80G(5)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai110Pune109Ahmedabad98Mumbai93Jaipur79Kolkata50Delhi30Bangalore28Surat25Hyderabad25Lucknow12Indore12Nagpur11Rajkot11Chandigarh8Agra6Amritsar5Panaji4Jodhpur3Allahabad3Raipur3Visakhapatnam2Jabalpur1SC1Cuttack1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 12A(1)(ac)12Section 12A6Section 143(1)5Exemption5Section 80G(5)(iv)4Natural Justice4Section 80G(5)(iii)2Section 80G(5)2

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 578/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

80G(5)(ii) of the Act, afresh on merits. The assessee is also directed to file the relevant details and documents, before learned CIT(Exemptions), as and when required by learned CIT(Exemptions). For statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed. 6. In the instant case, no sufficient opportunity of hearing was afforded to the appellant

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 579/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra
20 Feb 2026
AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

80G(5)(ii) of the Act, afresh on merits. The assessee is also directed to file the relevant details and documents, before learned CIT(Exemptions), as and when required by learned CIT(Exemptions). For statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed. 6. In the instant case, no sufficient opportunity of hearing was afforded to the appellant

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 417/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

ii) CIT vs. ITO CHU Corpn. (2004) 190 CTR (Del) 31: (2004) 268 ITR 172 (Del): (2004) 139 Taxman 348 (Del). The Tribunal has, in an elaborate order in which all the facts and the rival submissions have been taken into consideration, held that there was sufficient cause for the delay on the part of the assessee-society in making

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 88/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 164(1)Section 234Section 249(2)

condonation application considering reason of delay as not bonafide. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in not providing appropriate opportunity of being heard to the appellant for explaining the reason for delay in filing of appeal and dismissed the appeal which is against of law and principle of natural

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

ITA 267/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation applications

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

ITA 266/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation applications