Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80G(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai215 Chennai207 Pune207 Ahmedabad204 Jaipur145 Kolkata107 Delhi89 Bangalore69 Hyderabad54 Surat39 Chandigarh25 Lucknow23 Nagpur22 Amritsar16 Indore15 Rajkot14 Agra7 Visakhapatnam7 Jabalpur6 Jodhpur6 Panaji5 Raipur4 Cuttack4 Calcutta3 Cochin3 Allahabad3 SC2 Patna1 Ranchi1 Guwahati1 Varanasi1 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1

Key Topics

Section 12A(1)(ac)12 Section 12A10 Exemption6 Section 143(1)5 Section 80G(5)(iv)4 Natural Justice4 Section 1543 Section 80G(5)2 Section 80G(5)(iii)2

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 578/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condone the delay caused in filing application by the assessee in form AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and CIT (Exemption) Bhopal section 80G(5

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 579/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condone the delay caused in filing application by the assessee in form AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and CIT (Exemption) Bhopal section 80G(5

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 417/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

condone the delay in filing application in Form No. 10AB, under s. 80G(5) of the Act. We note that Co- ordinate Bench of Jodhpur in the case of Bhamashah Sundarlal Daga Charitable Trust vs CIT(Exemption) in (ITA No. 278/Jodh/2023, dt. 10th Nov. 2023) dealt with the issue of cl.(iii) 3rd proviso under s. 80G(5

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 88/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 164(1)Section 234Section 249(2)

condonation application considering reason of delay as not bonafide. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in not providing appropriate opportunity of being heard to the appellant for explaining the reason for delay in filing of appeal and dismissed the appeal which is against of law and principle of natural

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

ITA 266/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

section 80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

ITA 267/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

section 80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation

BABA SAUDAN SINGH VEERMATI DEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HATHRAS vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 11/AGR/2021[ -]Status: DisposedITAT Agra10 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalbaba Saudan Singh Veermati Vs. Commissioner Of Devi Educational Society, Income Tax Village Kurawali, Post Luheta Qadiri Building, Marris Tehsil Sadabad, Road, Aligarh, Dist. Hathras Up-281306 Uttar Pradesh-202001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabtb8953C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT-DR

Section 12ASection 154

80G(5)(vi) registration(s) in question. Learned CIT-DR vehemently submits that the assessee’s appeal first of all is very well time barred by 6 years 4 months and 8 days. His next plea is that the assessee has preferred itself Section 154 rectification followed by his writ petition filed before the hon’ble high court in rectification