MOHD ARIF,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(5), ETWAH, ETAWAH
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 271/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17] Mohd. Arif, Income Tax Officer, 68, Huiganj Pachraha, Etawah, Ward-2(2)(5), Income Tax Office, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-206001 Vs Civil Lines, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-207001 Pan-Anapa8542J Appellant Respondent
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282Section 54Section 56(2)(vii)
condone the delay of 231 days and admit this appeal for hearing.
3. Brief facts of the case:- The assessment was reopened in this case vide
notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2021 on the basis of an information that the assessee had sold an immovable property at a total consideration of Rs.49,20,000/- (as against the stamp
