BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 56(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai471Mumbai356Delhi352Kolkata246Bangalore215Hyderabad146Ahmedabad145Karnataka143Jaipur143Pune128Chandigarh109Nagpur84Lucknow53Calcutta43Amritsar41Indore40Panaji36Surat34Rajkot27Raipur23Visakhapatnam22Cochin20Cuttack16SC16Varanasi12Patna9Telangana9Jodhpur6Guwahati6Allahabad6Dehradun5Agra3Orissa2Jabalpur2Rajasthan1Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 234C7Section 143(1)4Section 1482Section 1472Section 115J2Section 234B2Section 2072Addition to Income2

AARA AGRO PVT. LTD.,AGRA vs. DY.CIT., CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra23 Nov 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenalt.A No. 54/Agr/2021 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) Vs. Cit Circle-2 (1)(1) Agra Agro Private Limited Agra U.P. Anjana Cinema, 3/2 D.M.G. Road Agra U.P. 282007 Pan: Aagca8595F (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 207Section 234BSection 234C

b) and] on an application made by the appellant in this behalf, the Commissioner (Appeals) may, for any good and sufficient reason to be recorded in writing, exempt him from the operation of the provisions of that clause." In the instant case, the appellant filed the appeal against the Order u/s 6. 143(1) of the Act, which was served

MOHD ARIF,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(5), ETWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 271/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17] Mohd. Arif, Income Tax Officer, 68, Huiganj Pachraha, Etawah, Ward-2(2)(5), Income Tax Office, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-206001 Vs Civil Lines, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-207001 Pan-Anapa8542J Appellant Respondent

Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282Section 54Section 56(2)(vii)

condone the delay of 231 days and admit this appeal for hearing. 3. Brief facts of the case:- The assessment was reopened in this case vide notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2021 on the basis of an information that the assessee had sold an immovable property at a total consideration of Rs.49,20,000/- (as against the stamp

KARAN KANT JAIN,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), ETAH

ITA 209/AGR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Naveen Garg (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151

B-Block, Krishna Enclave, ETAH-207001(Uttar {Pradesh) Kamla Nagar, Agra-282004 (UP) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AJEPJ-0370-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Naveen Garg (Advocate) – Ld. AR ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain (CIT) – Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 21-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 28-03-2025 आदेश