BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 55clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai519Mumbai475Delhi406Kolkata270Pune241Hyderabad229Bangalore205Ahmedabad168Karnataka142Jaipur130Chandigarh117Nagpur72Surat70Raipur66Visakhapatnam64Lucknow61Panaji61Indore58Amritsar42Calcutta37Cuttack27Rajkot26Cochin24Guwahati20SC15Patna14Telangana12Dehradun8Varanasi7Jodhpur7Allahabad5Agra4Orissa4Jabalpur3Ranchi3Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 145(3)5Section 364Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 2502Section 143(2)2Section 36(1)(viia)2Exemption2Deduction

ZILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNA, GUNA

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 348/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

section 250 of the Act, wherein Ld. CIT(A) has partly allowed/dismissed assessee’sappeals respectively. 2. At the very outset, it is noticed that both the appeals are time-barred by 39-40 days respectively. Delay condonation applications on behalf of Smt. RoshaniRaghuvanshi, staff member of the appellant are on record. The cause for the delay shown, is that

ZILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNA, GUNA

2
Carry Forward of Losses2

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 347/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

section 250 of the Act, wherein Ld. CIT(A) has partly allowed/dismissed assessee’sappeals respectively. 2. At the very outset, it is noticed that both the appeals are time-barred by 39-40 days respectively. Delay condonation applications on behalf of Smt. RoshaniRaghuvanshi, staff member of the appellant are on record. The cause for the delay shown, is that

SH. JUGENDRA SINGH YADAV,AGRA vs. ACIT, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 388/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 44A

condone the nominal delay of 10 days occurred in filing the appeals, as there was reasonable cause, which prevented the assessee to file the same within the period of limitation. 3. The brief facts of the cases are that the assessee is a civil contractor engaged in executing works contract for Agra Development Authority, Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority

MANOJ SHIVHARE,SHIVPURI vs. ITO, SHIVPURI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 59/AGR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra11 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: : Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 143(3)

55, Old Vs. Income-tax Officer, Magraoni, Shivpuri (MP) Shivpuri PAN : AXSPM4486H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Navin Gargh, Advocate Department by Sh. Shailendra Shrivastava, Sr. DR Date of hearing 11.02.2025 Date of pronouncement 11.02.2025 ORDER Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member: This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National