Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(1)6 Section 2504 Section 50C4 Section 11(1)(a)3 Section 11(1)3 Section 112 Section 143(1)(a)2 Deduction2 Addition to Income

RAJAT GOEL (HUF),MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 240/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2020-21]

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

section - 249(3), the appeal filed by the appellant should have been admitted because the delay of 54 days in filing of 1st appeal was on account of sufficient and reasonable cause duly explained to Ld. NFAC. The appellate order dated - 08.03.2025 passed by Ld. NFAC, Delhi is liable to be set aside. 2. That in view of reasonable cause

PRIYAVRAT SHARMA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 355/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed

RAJAT GOEL (HUF),MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

PRIYAVRAT SHARMA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

RAJAT GOEL (HUF),MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

PRIYAVRAT SHARMA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

BUNDELKHAND GRAMOTTHAN EVAM SHAIKCHHIK VIKAS SAMITI,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD EXEMPTION, AGRA

MOHD ARIF,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(5), ETWAH, ETAWAH