Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2716 Section 143(1)6 Section 145(3)5 Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 2504 Section 50C4 Addition to Income4 Section 11(1)(a)3 Section 11(1)

M/S KRISHAK SAHAKARI SHAKKAR KARKHANA,GUNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal is treated as allowed

ITA 145/AGR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

54,249/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not justified. 2. That, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, and in any view of the matter, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in dismissing the appeal as non maintainable because there was delay in I.T.A No. 145/Agra/2016

RAJAT GOEL (HUF),MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 240/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed

M/S KRISHAK SAHAKARI SHAKKAR KARKHANA,GUNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

RAJAT GOEL (HUF),MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

M/S KRISHAK SAHAKARI SHAKKAR KARKHANA,GUNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

RAJAT GOEL (HUF),MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

PRIYAVRAT SHARMA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

SH. JUGENDRA SINGH YADAV,AGRA vs. ACIT, AGRA

BUNDELKHAND GRAMOTTHAN EVAM SHAIKCHHIK VIKAS SAMITI,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD EXEMPTION, AGRA

MOHD ARIF,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(5), ETWAH, ETAWAH