JAGDEESH PRASAD,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, AAYKAR BHAWAN SANJAY PLACE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17]

5. The ld. AR of the assessee referred to the ground no.7 of the appeal which is reproduced as under:- “7. Because the learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the delay of only 43 days was unintentional and caused due to genuine hardship, including health issues of the appellant and his representative and due to disruption in office functioning

SHRI. SUNIL KUMAR S/O SRI DEVI SINGH ,MATHURA vs. ITO- 1(3)(4), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes