SHRI. SUNIL KUMAR S/O SRI DEVI SINGH ,MATHURA vs. ITO- 1(3)(4), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

delay is liable to condone in the light of such order. The copy of the order is enclosed herewith. So, it is requested to you kindly accept the appeal as regular accordingly and fixed the case for hearing, thanks.” 3.1. The explanation of the assessee has been considered and in view of the above Hon’ble Supreme Court order

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT-1, GWALIOR

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

1), all dated 10.07.2023, involving proceedings ITA No.172, 173 & 174/Agr/2024 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/appellant’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex- parte. 3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee’s instant three appeals is condoned

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT-1, GWALIOR

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

1), all dated 10.07.2023, involving proceedings ITA No.172, 173 & 174/Agr/2024 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/appellant’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex- parte. 3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee’s instant three appeals is condoned