BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai705Delhi599Mumbai497Kolkata293Bangalore223Ahmedabad184Jaipur184Hyderabad159Karnataka146Chandigarh141Pune121Nagpur75Surat62Amritsar59Indore57Raipur51Lucknow49Calcutta38Cochin34Visakhapatnam33SC26Cuttack26Rajkot20Patna19Telangana13Varanasi13Guwahati13Allahabad11Jodhpur7Dehradun7Panaji6Rajasthan5Orissa5Agra5Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh1Ranchi1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Addition to Income3Section 1472Section 69A2Cash Deposit2

JAGDEESH PRASAD,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, AAYKAR BHAWAN SANJAY PLACE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 275/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17]

Section 147Section 249(3)Section 69A

delay of only 43 days was unintentional and caused due to genuine hardship, including health issues of the appellant and his representative and due to disruption in office functioning due to renovation, which constitute "sufficient cause" within the meaning of section 249(3).” 5.1. Further, the ld. AR referred to the facts stated in the statement of facts filed before

SHRI. SUNIL KUMAR S/O SRI DEVI SINGH ,MATHURA vs. ITO- 1(3)(4), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 62/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
19 May 2025
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

Section 144Section 148Section 44A

delay is liable to condone in the light of such order. The copy of the order is enclosed herewith. So, it is requested to you kindly accept the appeal as regular accordingly and fixed the case for hearing, thanks.” 3.1. The explanation of the assessee has been considered and in view of the above Hon’ble Supreme Court order

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT, GWALIOR

Accordingly.\nAll other pleadings on merits stand rendered academic.\n7. These assessee's three appeals ITA Nos.172, 173 &\n174/Agr/2024 are allowed in above terms

ITA 172/AGR/2024[A.Y2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025
Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter\nreferred to as 'the Act').\n2. Cases\ncalled twice. None\nappears at the\nassessee's/appellant's behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex-\nparte.\n3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee's instant\nthree appeals is condoned in the larger interest of justice.\n4.\nLearned CIT(DR) vehemently

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT-1, GWALIOR

ITA 173/AGR/2024[A.Y 2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/appellant’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex- parte. 3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee’s instant three appeals is condoned in the larger interest of justice. 4. Learned CIT(DR) vehemently

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT-1, GWALIOR

ITA 174/AGR/2024[A.Y 2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/appellant’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex- parte. 3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee’s instant three appeals is condoned in the larger interest of justice. 4. Learned CIT(DR) vehemently