VARDAN CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3), GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

condone this delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case: In this case, the original assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 27.03.2015 at the assessed income of Rs.16,81,270/- after making an addition of Rs.2 lakhs. Thereafter, the case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act after obtaining the approval

GORA BAI SAHU ,ASHOK NAGAR vs. ITO ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13] Gora Bai Sahu, Income Tax Officer, Shri Ram Charan Sahu & Ashok Nagar, L/H Late Gora Bai, Sony Vs Madhya Pradesh-473331 Colony, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh-473331 Pan-Fdzps8877N Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Pankaj Gargh, Adv. Respondent By Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 17.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 15.09.2025 Order

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case:- This case was reopened u/s 148 of the Act vide noticed dated 28.03.2019 on the basis of AIR information of purchasing immovable property having value more than Rs. 30,00,000/-. The legal heir of the assessee Shri Ramcharan Lal Sahu filed the return

SMT. SIMRANJEET SINGH,AGRA vs. PR.CIT., AGRA

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalsmt. Simranjeet Singh Vs. Pr.Cit 158, Pratap Pura Sanjay Place, Agra Up- 282002 Agra 282002 Up "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Byeps9366J Appellant .. Respondent

33,625/- which involved three related parties namely Sh. Manjeet Singh, Sh. Paramjeet Singh an Sh. Surjeet Singh etc. 4. There would be hardly any dispute between the parties that not only the Assessing Officer had called for the assessee’s explanation qua the said entries by way of section 142(1) notice during the course of assessment but also