Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 282clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka122 Chennai122 Mumbai118 Jaipur83 Amritsar74 Delhi73 Kolkata67 Panaji63 Pune52 Bangalore46 Chandigarh31 Hyderabad26 Ahmedabad24 Surat18 Cochin14 Indore13 Lucknow11 Rajkot11 Raipur8 Allahabad7 Varanasi7 Nagpur7 Agra6 Cuttack6 Visakhapatnam6 Jodhpur4 Calcutta3 SC2 Patna2 Rajasthan1 Andhra Pradesh1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)10 Section 1486 Section 1474 Section 1444 Section 50C4 Addition to Income3 Section 2502 Section 143(1)(a)2 Cash Deposit

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 88/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 164(1)Section 234Section 249(2)

condonation of delay supported by affidavit filed by assessee before ld. CIT(A), keeping in view the provisions of section 282

CHANDRA PRAKASH GOPLANI,BENGALURU vs. ITO 2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

2

Condonation of Delay2

ITA 166/AGR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)

Section 282 of the 1961 Act and Rule 127 of the 1962 Rules. Reference is also drawn to the judgment and order of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector of Land Acquisition , Anantnag v. Mst. Katiji & Ors. 1987 AIR 1353.Under thefacts and circumstances of the case, I condone the delay

LD SARVODAYA HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,AGRA vs. ITO 2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhld Sarvodaya Hospital Private Limited, Vs. Ito 2(1)(1), G – 11, Kamla Nagar, Agra. Agra – 282 005 (Uttar Pradesh). (Pan : Aaccl7961N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 14.10.2025 Date Of Order : 28.10.2025 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman: 1. The Assessee Has Filed Appeal Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short] Dated 14.10.2024 For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. We Are Proceeding To Decide The Appeal With The Assistance Of The Ld. Dr Of The Revenue. 3. At The Time Of Hearing, It Is Observed That There Is A Delay Of 208 Days In Filing The Appeal Before The Tribunal On The Ground That The Managing

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR

282 005 (Uttar Pradesh). (PAN : AACCL7961N) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 14.10.2025 Date of Order : 28.10.2025 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : 1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

SAROJ,MAINPURI vs. I.T.O WARD 2(5), MAINPURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 218/AGR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra14 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148

condoning the delay in filing of the appeal. Reference is also drawn to the judgment of Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Ludhiana v. CIT(E), Chandigarh (2024) Live Law (PH)106(Case No. CWP-21028- 2023(O&M), in which Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court

PRIYAVRAT SHARMA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 355/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 50C

282 002 U.P. PAN : AIVPS1077J (Appellant)(Respondent) Assessee by Shri K.K. Jain, Adv. Department by Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing 15/10/2025 26.11.2025 Date of pronouncement ORDER PER : SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal has been preferred on behalf of the assessee against the order dated 24.08.2022 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi in appeal

MOHD ARIF,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(5), ETWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 271/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17] Mohd. Arif, Income Tax Officer, 68, Huiganj Pachraha, Etawah, Ward-2(2)(5), Income Tax Office, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-206001 Vs Civil Lines, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-207001 Pan-Anapa8542J Appellant Respondent

Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282Section 54Section 56(2)(vii)

delay of 231 days in filing of this appeal before us. The relevant extract of the condonation petition is reproduced as under:- “The Applicant most respectfully beg, pray and humbly submits as under:- Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Ld Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, New Delhi passed an order under section