ADITYA NARAYAN CHATURVEDI,ETAWAH vs. ITO WARD-2(2)(5), ETAWAH
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 226/AGR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra01 Apr 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14
Section 250(6)Section 269TSection 271E
section 269T of the Act, initiated penalty proceedings u/s. 271E of the
Act. Various notices issued to the assessee remained un-responded on his
behalf. Therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed penalty of Rs. 3,31,382/-
vide order dated 15.03.2022 u/s. 271E of the Act.
3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the learned
CIT(Appeals) who confirmed penalty