BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(47)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai451Mumbai322Delhi289Bangalore167Kolkata157Karnataka146Ahmedabad120Jaipur93Chandigarh93Hyderabad76Raipur73Nagpur67Pune63Calcutta38Indore35Visakhapatnam34Lucknow34Cuttack29Rajkot24SC21Cochin16Patna14Surat13Telangana9Allahabad7Amritsar6Varanasi6Agra6Guwahati5Rajasthan4Jodhpur4Orissa3Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 12A(1)(ac)8Section 80G(5)(iv)4Section 143(3)3Section 693Section 253(3)3Addition to Income3Condonation of Delay3Exemption3Natural Justice

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 417/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

47: (2013) 213 Taxman 65 (Del) (2013) 30 taxmann.com 41 (Del), wherein the Hon’ble Delhi High Court held as follows: “18. The main question that falls for our consideration is whether the Tribunal was justified in condoning the delay in the filing of the application for registration under s. 12A of the Act and whether the view taken

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

3
Section 80G(5)(iii)2
ITA 578/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
20 Feb 2026
AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

V CIT (Exemption) Evam Samaj Kalyan Samiti Bhopal H. No. 27, Block-M, Blue Lotus M.P. 462 011 Hill Colony, Behind New Collectorate, New City Centre Extension, Gwalior- 474 011 PAN : ABIAS7633P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, PCIT, DR Date of hearing 18/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 18/02/2026 ORDER PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 579/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

V CIT (Exemption) Evam Samaj Kalyan Samiti Bhopal H. No. 27, Block-M, Blue Lotus M.P. 462 011 Hill Colony, Behind New Collectorate, New City Centre Extension, Gwalior- 474 011 PAN : ABIAS7633P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, PCIT, DR Date of hearing 18/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 18/02/2026 ORDER PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER SHIVPURI, SHIVPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 114/AGR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 69

v. Mst. Katijee&Ors.(supra) 7. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 31.03.2017, declaring income of Rs.5,11,380/-. The assessee is in the business as Contractor and also engaged in trading in share market . Case of the assessee was selected by the Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, SHIPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 115/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 69

v. Mst. Katijee&Ors.(supra) 7. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 31.03.2017, declaring income of Rs.5,11,380/-. The assessee is in the business as Contractor and also engaged in trading in share market . Case of the assessee was selected by the Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, GWALIOR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 113/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 69

v. Mst. Katijee&Ors.(supra) 7. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 31.03.2017, declaring income of Rs.5,11,380/-. The assessee is in the business as Contractor and also engaged in trading in share market . Case of the assessee was selected by the Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS