SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

V CIT (Exemption) Evam Samaj Kalyan Samiti Bhopal H. No. 27, Block-M, Blue Lotus M.P. 462 011 Hill Colony, Behind New Collectorate, New City Centre Extension, Gwalior- 474 011 PAN : ABIAS7633P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, PCIT, DR Date of hearing 18/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 18/02/2026 ORDER PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

V CIT (Exemption) Evam Samaj Kalyan Samiti Bhopal H. No. 27, Block-M, Blue Lotus M.P. 462 011 Hill Colony, Behind New Collectorate, New City Centre Extension, Gwalior- 474 011 PAN : ABIAS7633P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, PCIT, DR Date of hearing 18/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 18/02/2026 ORDER PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER SHIVPURI, SHIVPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

v. Mst. Katijee&Ors.(supra) 7. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 31.03.2017, declaring income of Rs.5,11,380/-. The assessee is in the business as Contractor and also engaged in trading in share market . Case of the assessee was selected by the Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, SHIPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

v. Mst. Katijee&Ors.(supra) 7. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 31.03.2017, declaring income of Rs.5,11,380/-. The assessee is in the business as Contractor and also engaged in trading in share market . Case of the assessee was selected by the Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, GWALIOR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

v. Mst. Katijee&Ors.(supra) 7. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 31.03.2017, declaring income of Rs.5,11,380/-. The assessee is in the business as Contractor and also engaged in trading in share market . Case of the assessee was selected by the Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. The following grounds have been raised: “1. Because the Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly and illegally confirmed the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(l)(c) of the I. T. Act. 2. Because the assessee duly discharged her onus of proving the cash credits to be genuine. The addition

STATE BANK OF INDIA,GWALIOR vs. CIT A , GWALIOR

In the result, ITA No.42/Agr/2018 is allowed for statistical

47-49/Ag/2018 84- State Bank of ITO (TDS), AAACS8577K 86 City Center, BPLS06686B A.Y.2013-14 India, Branch- Gwalior Orcha, Tikamgarh 87- 40-41/Ag/2018 State Bank of ITO (TDS), AAACS8577K 88 City Center, BPLS11862E A.Y.2013-14 India, Branch- Gwalior karchal, Sheopur Appellant by Shri Ashok Vijyayabargiya, CA And Shri Rajendra Khatwani, CA Respondent by Shri Waseem Arshad, Sr. DR PAN/TAN

STATE BANK OF INDIA,GWALIOR vs. CIT A, GWALIOR

In the result, ITA No.42/Agr/2018 is allowed for statistical

47-49/Ag/2018 84- State Bank of ITO (TDS), AAACS8577K 86 City Center, BPLS06686B A.Y.2013-14 India, Branch- Gwalior Orcha, Tikamgarh 87- 40-41/Ag/2018 State Bank of ITO (TDS), AAACS8577K 88 City Center, BPLS11862E A.Y.2013-14 India, Branch- Gwalior karchal, Sheopur Appellant by Shri Ashok Vijyayabargiya, CA And Shri Rajendra Khatwani, CA Respondent by Shri Waseem Arshad, Sr. DR PAN/TAN