BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi147Mumbai106Chandigarh85Chennai70Kolkata62Jaipur57Raipur47Bangalore37Ahmedabad27Pune23Hyderabad23Lucknow19Indore17SC15Nagpur14Cuttack10Cochin8Surat8Visakhapatnam7Guwahati5Panaji4Agra2Amritsar2Rajkot2Patna2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 683Section 1473Section 69A2

S.P. TEA ESTATE (INDIA)(P)(LTD),GWALIOR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE -2, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 249/AGR/2025[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2009-10] S.P.Tea Estate (India) (P)(Ltd.), Acit, 2Nd Floor, Opp. Inderganj Police Circle-2, Station, Jayendraganj Lashkar, Vs Aayakar Bhawan, City Center, Gwalior, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh-474002 Madhya Pradesh-474009 Pan-Aaics2523F Appellant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

24 of the appeal set, which is reproduced as below:- 3 ITA No.249/Agr/2025 3. We have carefully considered the facts stated in the said application and in the affidavit. Upon consideration, we are of the considered view that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the said appeal. We, therefore, condone the delay of 976 days and admit

JAGDEESH PRASAD,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, AAYKAR BHAWAN SANJAY PLACE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 275/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17]

Section 147Section 249(3)Section 69A

2. Brief facts of the case:-The assessment in this case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act on the ground that the assessee had made cash deposits amounting to Rs.25,00,000/- and Rs.52,25,000/-in the accounts maintained with State Bank of India and HDFC Bank Ltd. respectively. The Assessing Officer also noted that the assessee