BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai204Delhi115Karnataka101Mumbai79Chandigarh61Pune50Kolkata39Amritsar35Bangalore30Jaipur30Ahmedabad29Panaji26Surat19Lucknow18Indore17Rajkot9Hyderabad7Agra5Cuttack5Patna5Telangana5Visakhapatnam5SC3Calcutta3Ranchi2Jabalpur2Raipur2Cochin1Guwahati1Allahabad1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income5Section 143(3)4Section 1474Section 271(1)(c)4Section 2502Section 1482Section 143(2)2Penalty2Condonation of Delay

MR.SHAILENDRA KUMAR,AGRA vs. ITO,WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

ITA 228/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

173 days. It transpires from the perusal of impugned order that the assessee did neither mention the factum of delay in filing first appeal in form No. 35 nor moved any delay condonation application before ld. 3 | P a g e ITA No. 228 & 229/Agr/2025 CIT(Appeals). However, the appellant assessee has moved delay condonation application along with death certificate

MR.SHAILENDRA KUMAR ,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), AGRA

2

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

ITA 229/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

173 days. It transpires from the perusal of impugned order that the assessee did neither mention the factum of delay in filing first appeal in form No. 35 nor moved any delay condonation application before ld. 3 | P a g e ITA No. 228 & 229/Agr/2025 CIT(Appeals). However, the appellant assessee has moved delay condonation application along with death certificate

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT, GWALIOR

Accordingly.\nAll other pleadings on merits stand rendered academic.\n7. These assessee's three appeals ITA Nos.172, 173 &\n174/Agr/2024 are allowed in above terms

ITA 172/AGR/2024[A.Y2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025
Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter\nreferred to as 'the Act').\n2. Cases\ncalled twice. None\nappears at the\nassessee's/appellant's behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex-\nparte.\n3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee's instant\nthree appeals is condoned in the larger interest of justice.\n4.\nLearned CIT(DR) vehemently

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT-1, GWALIOR

ITA 173/AGR/2024[A.Y 2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 143(3)

173 & 174/Agr/2024 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/appellant’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex- parte. 3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee’s instant three appeals is condoned

MEERA AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT-1, GWALIOR

ITA 174/AGR/2024[A.Y 2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 143(3)

173 & 174/Agr/2024 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/appellant’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex- parte. 3. Identical delay of 236 days in filing the assessee’s instant three appeals is condoned