GORA BAI SAHU ,ASHOK NAGAR vs. ITO ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13] Gora Bai Sahu, Income Tax Officer, Shri Ram Charan Sahu & Ashok Nagar, L/H Late Gora Bai, Sony Vs Madhya Pradesh-473331 Colony, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh-473331 Pan-Fdzps8877N Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Pankaj Gargh, Adv. Respondent By Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 17.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 15.09.2025 Order

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case:- This case was reopened u/s 148 of the Act vide noticed dated 28.03.2019 on the basis of AIR information of purchasing immovable property having value more than Rs. 30,00,000/-. The legal heir of the assessee Shri Ramcharan Lal Sahu filed the return

RAHUL JAIN,INDORE vs. ITO WARD-1, MORENA, MORENA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

condone the delay caused in filing both these appeals before the Tribunal. 2 | P a g e ITA No. 420 & 421/Agr/2025 ITA No. 420/Agr/2025: 4. Briefly stating, the facts are that the assessee did not file any return of income for A.Y. 2017-18. Based on the information gathered by department, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had deposited

RAHUL JAIN,INDORE vs. ITO WARD-1, MORENA, MORENA

In the result, both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

condone the delay caused in filing both these appeals before the Tribunal. 2 | P a g e ITA No. 420 & 421/Agr/2025 ITA No. 420/Agr/2025: 4. Briefly stating, the facts are that the assessee did not file any return of income for A.Y. 2017-18. Based on the information gathered by department, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had deposited