Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12A4 Section 112

KARAN KANT JAIN,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), ETAH

ITA 209/AGR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Naveen Garg (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain (CIT) – Ld. DR

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151

delay of 288 days in the appeal which stand condoned. 2. The Ld. AR, at the outset, raised a pertinent legal ground and stated that the reopening approval was given in a mechanical manner and therefore, the impugned proceedings are liable to be quashed. For the same, Ld. AR ahs referred to various judicial decisions, the copies of which have

KARAN KANT JAIN,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), ETAH

JAHNVI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,AGRA vs. ITO, WARD EXEMTION, AGRA RCC, AGRA

KARAN KANT JAIN,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), ETAH

JAHNVI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,AGRA vs. ITO, WARD EXEMTION, AGRA RCC, AGRA