BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai500Chennai384Delhi223Bangalore206Karnataka140Kolkata135Jaipur129Hyderabad126Pune111Chandigarh89Ahmedabad79Calcutta40Cuttack35Amritsar34Indore32Patna28Visakhapatnam27Lucknow25Cochin24Surat21Nagpur20SC12Rajkot9Telangana8Agra6Guwahati6Raipur6Allahabad5Varanasi4Jodhpur2Orissa2Panaji1Himachal Pradesh1Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1Jabalpur1Kerala1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1477Section 1487Addition to Income6Section 142(1)4Section 143(3)3Section 54F3House Property3Deduction3Section 69A2Section 144

ADARSH SINGH KUSHWAH,GWALIOR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1), GWALIOR , GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 289/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2017-18] Adarsh Singh Kushwah, Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tansen Nagar, Hazira, Gwalior, Tax, Circle-3(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Madhya Pradesh-474002 Vs City Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh-474011 Pan-Ajvpk5450E Appellant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 253(5)Section 69A

delay. The relevant extract of the condonation application is reproduced as below:- “MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR, 1. That, the assessee is an individual having income from salary, house property

RAJNI CHAUHAN,AGRA vs. DCIT CENTRE CIRCLE , AGRA

The appeal stand partly allowed

2
Section 2502
Cash Deposit2
ITA 150/AGR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
28 Mar 2025
AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.150/Agr/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Smt. Rajni Chauhan Dcit – Central Circle बनाम/ Sec-47, Moti Katra Agra Vs. Agra 282003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aqwpr-3516-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Deepender Mohan (Ca) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain – Ld. Cit Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28-03-2025

For Appellant: Shri Deepender Mohan (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain – Ld. CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 23Section 23(1)(a)Section 23(1)(c)

house property’. The registry has noted delay of 7 days which stand condoned. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal

SAROJ,MAINPURI vs. I.T.O WARD 2(5), MAINPURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 218/AGR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra14 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148

house wife and also submitted copy of power of attorney dated 20.03.2012 and copy of sale deed of two immovable properties sold by Sh. Sugriv Singh on 07.11.2012 for Rs.10,50,000/- and Rs.4,45,000/-. It was submitted that the power of attorney was given by her husband to Shri Sugriv Singh to sell the immovable property

AKHLESH KUMAR TIWARI,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AGRA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 370/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 250(6)Section 54F

house property worth Rs.25,85,000/-. 3. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before ld. CIT(Appeals), who dismissed assessee’s first appeal ex parte. 2 | P a g e 4. Appellant assessee has filed this second appeal on the ground, in addition to others, that Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in dismissing the appeal without adjudicating the issues raised

VINEETA DEVI,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAWAH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 15/AGR/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Agra02 Apr 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2019-20]

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)(x)Section 69A

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case:- The assessee is an individual assessee and had not filed her return of income for A.Y.2019-20. The Assessing Officer received information through Insight Portal of the Department that for the Assessment Year 2019-20 the assessee had purchased an immovable property for Rs.1

MOHD ARIF,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(5), ETWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 271/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17] Mohd. Arif, Income Tax Officer, 68, Huiganj Pachraha, Etawah, Ward-2(2)(5), Income Tax Office, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-206001 Vs Civil Lines, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh-207001 Pan-Anapa8542J Appellant Respondent

Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282Section 54Section 56(2)(vii)

condone the delay of 231 days and admit this appeal for hearing. 3. Brief facts of the case:- The assessment was reopened in this case vide notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2021 on the basis of an information that the assessee had sold an immovable property at a total consideration of Rs.49,20,000/- (as against the stamp