BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

340 results for “condonation of delay”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6,162Mumbai5,355Delhi4,820Kolkata3,420Pune2,601Bangalore2,305Ahmedabad1,653Hyderabad1,619Jaipur1,071Patna1,049Cochin772Chandigarh764Nagpur704Cuttack700Surat681Indore622Visakhapatnam504Amritsar478Lucknow462Raipur451Karnataka391Rajkot388Agra340Calcutta258Panaji253Dehradun156Guwahati143Jodhpur119Jabalpur102Ranchi96SC79Telangana77Allahabad68Varanasi44Kerala32Andhra Pradesh21Orissa14Punjab & Haryana12Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Uttarakhand1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income59Section 14746Section 14442Section 25037Natural Justice37Section 14833Section 15432Condonation of Delay29Section 143(3)27

AARA AGRO PVT. LTD.,AGRA vs. DY.CIT., CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/AGR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra23 Nov 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenalt.A No. 54/Agr/2021 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) Vs. Cit Circle-2 (1)(1) Agra Agro Private Limited Agra U.P. Anjana Cinema, 3/2 D.M.G. Road Agra U.P. 282007 Pan: Aagca8595F (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 207Section 234BSection 234C

delay is not condoned. Your good self has been vested with inherent powers to condone the delay

SULEMAN KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JHANSI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 340 · Page 1 of 17

...
Section 143(1)27
Cash Deposit23
Section 271(1)(c)19
ITA 361/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

Section 133(6)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 2Section 250Section 69A

delay of about 148 days. Prayed to condone the delay. The aforesaid reasons for delay are supported

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 417/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

condoning the delay, straightaway rejected assessee’s application without going on merit of the case. Further submitting to condone

SARIF,JALESAR ETAH vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(1) , ETAH

In the result, both the appeals ITA Nos

ITA 464/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

delay condonation application are treated as sufficient and condone the delay caused in filing the appeal

SARIF,JALESAR, ETAH vs. ASSESSIN OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(1), DINESH NAGAR ETAH

In the result, both the appeals ITA Nos

ITA 463/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

delay condonation application are treated as sufficient and condone the delay caused in filing the appeal

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 578/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

delayed and the condonation application was filed on 14th March, 2006 narrating the events that led to the delay

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

ITA 579/AGR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

delayed and the condonation application was filed on 14th March, 2006 narrating the events that led to the delay

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, GWALIOR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 113/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 69

condonation of delay. The assessee has filed the appeal with the Tribunal on 30.03.2024 belatedly with a delay

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER SHIVPURI, SHIVPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 114/AGR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 69

condonation of delay. The assessee has filed the appeal with the Tribunal on 30.03.2024 belatedly with a delay

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, SHIPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 115/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 69

condonation of delay. The assessee has filed the appeal with the Tribunal on 30.03.2024 belatedly with a delay

MOHD. YUNUS WARSI,AGRA vs. ITO 1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 168/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 144BSection 147Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 250

delay condonation application which are un-controverted. Hence, there exists sufficient cause for condonation of delay

SUDHIR YADAV,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(5), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 82/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

Section 147

Condonation of delay "Sufficient cause" "Sufficient cause" for the purpose of condonation of delay should be interpreted

MUSTAKEEN AHAMAD,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -2(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 149/AGR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Jun 2025AY 2011-12
Section 144Section 249Section 250

condone the delay.\nSaid delay caused in filing this appeal is accordingly condoned.\n3. Learned counsel

M/SWAHEGURU BUSINESS (P) LTD.,SARV NAGAR vs. DCIT-CC, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 46/AGR/2020[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Feb 2021AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 272ASection 272A(1)(d)

condone the delay in filing the appeal is against the order passed by the assessing officer under section

SHRI RAM PRASAD VERMA PURVA MADHYAMIC VIDHYALAY ,MATHURA vs. ACIT,CPC-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 5/AGR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumar

Section 200ASection 234E

delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) needs to be condoned. We accordingly condone the delay

SHRI RAM PRASAD VERMA PURVA MADHYAMIC VIDHYALAY ,MATHURA vs. ACIT,CPC-TDS,GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 3/AGR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumar

Section 200ASection 234E

delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) needs to be condoned. We accordingly condone the delay

SHRI RAM PRASAD VERMA PURVA MADHYAMIC VIDHYALAY ,MATHURA vs. ACIT,CPS-TDS, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 4/AGR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumar

Section 200ASection 234E

delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) needs to be condoned. We accordingly condone the delay

SH. RAM PRASAD VERMA PURVA MADHYAMIC VIDHYALAY,MATHURA vs. ACIT-CPC TDS., , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 6/AGR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Laliet Kumar

Section 200ASection 234E

delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) needs to be condoned. We accordingly condone the delay

MUBIM BEGAN,ETAWAH vs. ITO, WARD 2(2)(5), ETAWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 273/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: :Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2016-17

Section 250

condone the delay. 3. Considering the aforesaid reasons, given in the delay condonation application and in the interest

AARUSH JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 169/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(1)Section 250

condonation of the delay was given in the delay condonation applications, which were supported by affidavits