SARIF,JALESAR ETAH vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(1) , ETAH

In the result, both the appeals ITA Nos

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Delay condonation application is supported with assessee’s uncontroverted affidavit. The cause for the delay seems to be sufficient and the delay

SARIF,JALESAR, ETAH vs. ASSESSIN OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(1), DINESH NAGAR ETAH

In the result, both the appeals ITA Nos

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Delay condonation application is supported with assessee’s uncontroverted affidavit. The cause for the delay seems to be sufficient and the delay

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

delayed and the condonation application was filed on 14th March, 2006 narrating the events that led to the delay. 19. In the above

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

delayed and the condonation application was filed on 14th March, 2006 narrating the events that led to the delay. 19. In the above

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, SHIPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

condonation of delay is concerned. 6. After hearing both the parties, I am of the considered view that the delay

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SHIVPURI, GWALIOR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

condonation of delay is concerned. 6. After hearing both the parties, I am of the considered view that the delay

CHANDRAPAL SINGH,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER SHIVPURI, SHIVPURI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar

condonation of delay is concerned. 6. After hearing both the parties, I am of the considered view that the delay

MOHD. YUNUS WARSI,AGRA vs. ITO 1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2014-15

delay condonation application which are un-controverted. Hence, there exists sufficient cause for condonation of delay. We accordingly condone the delay

SUDHIR YADAV,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(5), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

Condonation of delay "Sufficient cause" "Sufficient cause" for the purpose of condonation of delay should be interpreted with a view

MUSTAKEEN AHAMAD,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -2(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

condone the delay.\nSaid delay caused in filing this appeal is accordingly condoned.\n3. Learned counsel for the assessee further

MUBIM BEGAN,ETAWAH vs. ITO, WARD 2(2)(5), ETAWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

Bench: :Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2016-17

condone the delay. 3. Considering the aforesaid reasons, given in the delay condonation application and in the interest of justice

AARUSH JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay of 2176 days for both the assessment years and reasonable explanation for condonation of the delay was given in the delay

AARUSH JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay of 2176 days for both the assessment years and reasonable explanation for condonation of the delay was given in the delay

MAYA SHIKSHAN PASHISHAN SANSTHAN,HATHRAS vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(4), HATHRAS

In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2018-19

condonation of delay is rejected, the proceedings will automatically fail. It is, thus, settled that without condoning the delay in filing

SNEHA PANDEY,ETAWAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(2)(5) ETAWAH, ETAWAH

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

delay condonation application. Prayed to\ncondone the delay.\n3.\nConsidering the aforesaid reasons, given in the delay condonation\napplication supported

JITENDRA PAL SINGH,JHANSI vs. ITO WARD 2(3)1 JHANSI, JHANSI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2018-19

delay condonation application. Prayed to condone the delay. 3. Considering the aforesaid reasons, given in the delay condonation application supported

RAM SWAROOP AGARWAL,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2017-18

delay condonation application. Prayed to condone the delay. 3. Considering the aforesaid reasons, given in the delay condonation application supported

MUKESH KUMAR,AURAIYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(4), AURAIYA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes

condonation of delay. He submitted that ld. CIT\n(A) was unjustified in refusing to condone the delay ignoring the facts