BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(ix)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai29Delhi24Pune23Bangalore19Ahmedabad12Kolkata11Chandigarh10Lucknow8Jaipur6Surat6Rajkot4Amritsar3Chennai3Cochin3Hyderabad3Indore3Agra2Jodhpur2Nagpur2Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 80G6Section 80G(5)4Section 2(15)2Exemption2

DHIRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 180/AGR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

5) of the Act. ITA No.180 & 174/Agr/2025 2. Perused the records and heard learned representative for the assessee and learned departmental representative. 3. During the course of appellate proceedings before us, the Learned Authorised Representative contended that the Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G without appreciating the submissions

DHRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 174/AGR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

5) of the Act. ITA No.180 & 174/Agr/2025 2. Perused the records and heard learned representative for the assessee and learned departmental representative. 3. During the course of appellate proceedings before us, the Learned Authorised Representative contended that the Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G without appreciating the submissions