SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay CIT (Exemption) Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that is, the issue mention in cl. (iii) of 3rd proviso

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay 8 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji Sarvajanik Nyas v CIT (Exemption)Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION ,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurpose

II) in a case referred to in sub-clause (iv) or in item (B) of sub-clause\n(vi) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, rejecting such application, after\naffording a reasonable opportunity of being heard;\"\nIt is also pertinent to note that no Show Cause Notice was issued\nby the CIT prior to the rejection of the application

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

ii) or sub-clause iii) or sub- clause (v) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A rejecting such application and also cancelling its registration; (Il) in a case referred to in sub-clause (iv) or in item (B) of sub-clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, rejecting such application, after affording a reasonable opportunity

DHRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

5) of the Act. ITA No.180 & 174/Agr/2025 2. Perused the records and heard learned representative for the assessee and learned departmental representative. 3. During the course of appellate proceedings before us, the Learned Authorised Representative contended that the Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G without appreciating the submissions

DHIRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

5) of the Act. ITA No.180 & 174/Agr/2025 2. Perused the records and heard learned representative for the assessee and learned departmental representative. 3. During the course of appellate proceedings before us, the Learned Authorised Representative contended that the Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G without appreciating the submissions

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

5 because other Form i.e. ITR 7 is prescribed for Chantable and Religious Trust which is Registered u/s 12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act, while Appellant Trust is not a Charitable and Religious Trust and also not Registered u/s12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act but a Private Family Trust which is not liable for filing

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation applications

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation applications

OMKAR MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY ,GWALIOR vs. CIT[EXEMPTION], BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Omkar Memorial Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society, Bhopal Room No. 201, Ii Floor, Reac, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaa08054B Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/02/2025

II Floor, REAC, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAAA08054B Assessee by : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue by: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR Date of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date of pronouncement 27/02/2025 O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: 1. The appeal in ITA No.160/AGR/2024, arises out of the order of the ld Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption

INDIAN WOMEN IMPACT, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

80G of the Act by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow vide respective orders dated 28.11.2024 and 30.12.2024. 2. Brief facts of the case in ITA No.34/Agr/2025: The application for registration of the trust u/s 12AB of the Act was filed on 02.05.2024 by the assessee in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules

INDIAN WOMEN IMPACT, JAIPUR ,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

80G of the Act by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow vide respective orders dated 28.11.2024 and 30.12.2024. 2. Brief facts of the case in ITA No.34/Agr/2025: The application for registration of the trust u/s 12AB of the Act was filed on 02.05.2024 by the assessee in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules