SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

5) of the Act. This will be the harmonious interpretation. 11. If we agree with the interpretation of the learned CIT(Exemptions), then say a trust which was formed in the year 2000, performed charitable activities since 2000, but did not applied for registration under s. 80G, the said trust will never be able to apply for registration now. This

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

5) of the Act. This will be the harmonious interpretation. 11. If we agree with the interpretation of the learned CIT(Exemptions), then say a trust which was formed in the year 2000, performed charitable activities since 2000, but did not applied for registration under s. 80G, the said trust will never be able to apply for registration now. This

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION ,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurpose

charitable activity of the trust. Accordingly, he rejected the\napplication filed in Form No.10AB for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act.\nHowever, he noted that no adverse inference was drawn on provisional\nregistration dated 23.01.2024 granted vide Unique Registration\nNo.AAFTK5310AF20241 to the said trust.\n9.1. Therefore, rejection of application dated 12.06.2024 seeking approval\nu/s 80G

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

80G of the Act by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow vide orders both dated 31.12.2024. 2. Brief facts of the case in ITA No.112/Agr/2025: The application for registration of the trust u/s 12AB of the Act was filed on 12.06.2024 by the assessee in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules

DHIRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

charitable activities are entirely funded through voluntary donations. Therefore, in the absence of timely grant of registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, the trust’s ability to raise necessary funds would be severely impaired, thereby adversely affecting the education and future of underprivileged students who are the direct beneficiaries of its efforts

DHRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

charitable activities are entirely funded through voluntary donations. Therefore, in the absence of timely grant of registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, the trust’s ability to raise necessary funds would be severely impaired, thereby adversely affecting the education and future of underprivileged students who are the direct beneficiaries of its efforts

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

5 because other Form i.e. ITR 7 is prescribed for Chantable and Religious Trust which is Registered u/s 12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act, while Appellant Trust is not a Charitable and Religious Trust and also not Registered u/s12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act but a Private Family Trust which is not liable for filing

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

section 80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation

BHARTIYA SADBHAWNA MANCH,JHANSI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 266/Agr/2025 and 267/Agr/2025 are allowed

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

section 80G(5) of the Act were rejected. ITA No.266 & 267/Agr/2025 2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of the Bench that both these appeals were filed on 08.05.2025 against the impugned orders dated 29.11.2024 and 30.12.2024 by a delay of about 94 days and 66 days respectively. Assessee has submitted through the delay condonation

LIONS CLUB GUNA CITY PARMARTHIK NIYAS,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), GWALIOR

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2017-18

80G. Appellant assessee claimed the exemption u/s 11 of the Act at the time of filing return. The CPC, Bengaluru considered Rs. 1,92,66,092/- as income of the appellant and raised demand of Rs.89,74,690/-, whereas according to the assessee, it had carried out charitable activities and had applied more than 85% of its receipts for charitable

INDIAN WOMEN IMPACT, JAIPUR ,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

80G of the Act by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow vide respective orders dated 28.11.2024 and 30.12.2024. 2. Brief facts of the case in ITA No.34/Agr/2025: The application for registration of the trust u/s 12AB of the Act was filed on 02.05.2024 by the assessee in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules

INDIAN WOMEN IMPACT, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

80G of the Act by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow vide respective orders dated 28.11.2024 and 30.12.2024. 2. Brief facts of the case in ITA No.34/Agr/2025: The application for registration of the trust u/s 12AB of the Act was filed on 02.05.2024 by the assessee in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules

OMKAR MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY ,GWALIOR vs. CIT[EXEMPTION], BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Omkar Memorial Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society, Bhopal Room No. 201, Ii Floor, Reac, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaa08054B Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/02/2025

5. With regard to professional payments made by the assessee during the FY 2021-22, the assessee had given the details of the addresses to whom the payments were made and which were duly subjected to deduction of tax at source together with the concerned ledger account. The ld CIT(E) had disregarded this ledger account and observed that