JHASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JHANSI vs. DY. C.I.T., CIRCLE-4, AGRA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

24. Lastly it was submitted that Provisions of section 10(46) and 2(15) read with section 11 and 12 are independent provisions comprised in the I.T. Act. Infact, Central government notifies certain institutions u/s 10(46), whose income from all sources shall remain exempt. While in case of provisions of section 2(15), 11 and 12, the income / receipts

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

trust attracted the proviso to section 2(15) and hence these were not for 'charitable purpose' and fur this reason provisions of section 13(8) of the I.T.Act are clearly attracted. (ii) That, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law in directing to exclude Rs.17,56,27.767/- from the amount of Rs.42,24

DHIRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

section 2(15) of the Act. In support of the charitable nature of its activities, the appellant trust has placed before us voluminous documentary evidence, including - (i) Copy of Trust Deed; (ii) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed with Brij Dham Vidya Mandir; (iii) Confirmation from Brij Dham Vidya Mandir Sr. Secondary School, Mathura; (iv) CBSE affiliation certificate of Brij Dham

DHRITI FOUNDATION TRUST,MATHURA vs. ITO WARD, 1(3)(1), MATHURA, MATHURA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

section 2(15) of the Act. In support of the charitable nature of its activities, the appellant trust has placed before us voluminous documentary evidence, including - (i) Copy of Trust Deed; (ii) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed with Brij Dham Vidya Mandir; (iii) Confirmation from Brij Dham Vidya Mandir Sr. Secondary School, Mathura; (iv) CBSE affiliation certificate of Brij Dham

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF DIVINE LOVE JAGADGURU DHAM ,MATHURA vs. ITO,WARD (EXEMPTION), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshinternational Society Of Divine Vs. Ito, Love Jagadguru Dham Raman Ward (Exemption), Reti, Vrindavan, Mathura- Aayankar Bhawan, 281121 Sanjay Place, Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aati2546M Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 03/02/2026

charitable purposes and completed the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 08-03-2021. The Assessee Trust challenged the assessment order before the learned NFAC. 5. The learned NFAC observed that the Assessee Trust had incurred expenditure of Rs. 24

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA vs. DR. ANIL KUMAR VERMA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the C

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaa.Y. :2009-10

24. In respect to Bharat Bansal, the ld. DR has brought to our notice the copy of the confirmation filed by the assessee before the Assessing Officer and it was submitted that in the confirmation filed by the assessee, only an amount of Rs.1,50,000 was shown as credit in the books of account of Shri Bharat Bansal

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay CIT (Exemption) Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that is, the issue mention in cl. (iii) of 3rd proviso

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay CIT (Exemption) Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that is, the issue mention in cl. (iii) of 3rd proviso

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay 8 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji Sarvajanik Nyas v CIT (Exemption)Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that

OMKAR MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY ,GWALIOR vs. CIT[EXEMPTION], BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Omkar Memorial Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society, Bhopal Room No. 201, Ii Floor, Reac, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaa08054B Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/02/2025

Section 11(2) of the Act to be applied in future. The various receipts derived by the assessee in the form of dialysis receipts, xray receipts, interest receipts etc were applied for meeting out the charitable activities and all these facts are evidenced from audited balance sheet as well as income and expenditure account for the years ended

ACIT-CIRCEL-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. MAYANK AGRAWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

24. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. 25. With regard to Revenue’s appeal being ITA No.337/Agr/2025, the relevant grounds of appeal are as under: “1) That the CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in passing the appeal order without appreciating the facts that the case has been decentralized and jurisdiction is with

ACIT-CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. PUNEET AGARWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

24. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. 25. With regard to Revenue’s appeal being ITA No.337/Agr/2025, the relevant grounds of appeal are as under: “1) That the CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in passing the appeal order without appreciating the facts that the case has been decentralized and jurisdiction is with

VISHWAMBHAR DAYAL AGARWAL,AGRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

24. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. 25. With regard to Revenue’s appeal being ITA No.337/Agr/2025, the relevant grounds of appeal are as under: “1) That the CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in passing the appeal order without appreciating the facts that the case has been decentralized and jurisdiction is with

JAHNVI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,AGRA vs. ITO, WARD EXEMTION, AGRA RCC, AGRA

The appeal stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.141/Agr/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) M/S Jahnvi Educational Trust Ito (Exemption) बनाम/ Vs. 130, Sector-9, Avas Vikas Colony Aaykar Bhawan Mg Road Sikandra Up – 282007 Sanjay Placed, Agra "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aabtj-1711-A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Rajesh Malhotra (Ca) - Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Shailendra Shrivastava – Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28-03-2025

section (1) of Sec.12A, the assessee was required to obtain fresh registration within three months from 01-04-2021. However, this date was extended till 25-11-2022 vide circular no. 22 of 2022 dated 01-11- 2022. Thereafter, another Circular No.6 was issued on 24-05-2023 clarifying the provisions relating to charitable and religious trust

AKHIL BHARTIYA GAHOI VAISHAY CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, WARD EXEMPLTION

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Charitable Trust, Ward Exemption Gahoi Bhawan, Raja Bachar Ki Goth, Daulat Ganj Lashkar, MP (Respondent) (Appellant) PAN:AADTA7285J Assessee by : Shri Rajendra Sharma, Adv Revenue by: Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 03/02/2025 Date of pronouncement 03/02/2025 ORDER 1. The appeal in ITA No.183/AGR/2023 for AY 2017-18, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA vs. SH. VISHWAMBHAR DAYAL AGARWAL, AGRA

24 to 28, from pages 39 to 47 of the said\njudgment.\niii).\nSimilar, is the case of Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT in the case of\n'M/s AB Alcobev Pvt. Ltd.' in ITA No. 356/Chd/2024, for which, the copy\nhas been placed at pages 51 to 126 of the said judgment and this issue has\nbeen discussed threadbare