ACIT CIRCLE-4, AGRA vs. JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

charitable as per the section 2(15) amended by Finance Act, 2008. 9. This order of withdrawal of registration u/s 12A was challenged by the assessee before the Hon’ble ITAT, Agra, which was allowed by the tribunal by order dated 30.3.2012. 10. For the assessment year under consideration, the assessee filed the return of income showing nil income

OM DARSHAN TURST ,BAREILLY vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

18 various activities (three) which were carried out by the assessee for charitable purposes. The above said aspect has not been denied by the ld CIT DR, however he had raised some objection to that activities and sought to justify the act of the CIT exemption. In our view the order impugned before us is conspicuous silent on the carrying

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

trust attracted the proviso to section 2(15) and hence these were not for 'charitable purpose' and fur this reason provisions of section 13(8) of the I.T.Act are clearly attracted. (ii) That, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law in directing to exclude Rs.17,56,27.767/- from the amount of Rs.42,24,51,350/- by ignoring the provisions

FIROZABAD SHIKOHABAD,FIROZABAD vs. C.I.T.-II, AGRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: This Bench, Alongwith The Annexures Mentioned Therein. The Contents Thereof Are As Follows:

trust deed' of the assessee. In these facts and circumstances of the case, the proviso to Section 2(15) is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case, and the assessee was entitled to exemption provided under Section 11 for the relevant assessment year. 32. From the record, it also appears that the "authority" had been maintaining infrastructure

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

section 12A should not be rejected merely because the trust has not yet undertaken substantial activities or because the balance sheet is in the early stages of its establishment. The Court noted that the genuineness of the trust's activities can only be evaluated over time, and the initial phase should not be a barrier to registration. • M/s. Radha Krishna

SAMARPAN ANNAM DANAM CHARITABLE SOCIETY,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is allowed

section 12AA of the Act. There the Commissioner would be bound to record the finding that an activity or activities actually carried on by the Trust are not genuine being not in accordance with the objects of the Trust. Similarly, the situation would be different where the trust has before applying for registration found to have undertaken activities contrary

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

18, Subhash Ganj, v. CPC, Bangaluru. Ashoknagar-473331, Madhya Pradesh. PAN :AAFTA1477Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Subhash Chand Jain, CA Revenue by Sh. Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of hearing 31.12.2024 Date of pronouncement 17.01.2025 ORDER This appeal in ITA No. 88/Agr/2024 for the assessment year 2015- 16 has arisen from the appellate order dated 29.01.2024 [DIN & Order

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF DIVINE LOVE JAGADGURU DHAM ,MATHURA vs. ITO,WARD (EXEMPTION), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshinternational Society Of Divine Vs. Ito, Love Jagadguru Dham Raman Ward (Exemption), Reti, Vrindavan, Mathura- Aayankar Bhawan, 281121 Sanjay Place, Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aati2546M Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 03/02/2026

charitable purposes in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. 4. I have heard the Learned DR and perused the materials available on record. The Assessee Trust is duly registered under Section 12AA of the Act. The Assessee Trust had filed its return of income for assessment year 18

R.S. PUBLIC SCHOOL,AGRA vs. CIT EXMP., LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenam/S Shri R.S. Public School, Vs. Cit(Exemptions) Bainpur Road, Sikandra, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Agra, (U.P.) Nagar, Lucknow Pan Aagts 6694 C

charitable purposes which has not been controverted by the ld CIT (E) in the impugned order and the ld. CIT (DR). 13. In the case of ‘Orrisa Cricket Association Vs. CIT(E)’, in ITA No.335/CTK/2017 (AY: 1997-1998), dtd. 20/12/2017, ITAT, Cuttack Bench in its Order (APB,72-102) held that: “The violation of provisions of Section

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA vs. DR. ANIL KUMAR VERMA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the C

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaa.Y. :2009-10

18 CO No.22 /Agr/2013 Rs.1,50,000/- is accepted on the basis of the books of account of the Bharat Bansal. However, the C.O. of the assessee in respect of remaining Rs.1,50,000/- which was sustained by the ld. CIT(A), we are of the opinion that the assessee’s explanation is without any merit and accordingly, the same

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay CIT (Exemption) Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that is, the issue mention in cl. (iii) of 3rd proviso

SIDDHI VINAYAK SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI ,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXTEMPTION) , BHOPAL

In the result, the both the appeals ITA No

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay CIT (Exemption) Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that is, the issue mention in cl. (iii) of 3rd proviso

SHRI ACHLESHWAR MAHADEVJI JI SARVJANIK NIYAS,GWALIOR vs. CIT(E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji V Cit (Exemption) Sarvajanik Nyas, Sanatan Bhopal Dharm Mandir Road Gwalior- 474 001 Pan : Aahts1225J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of "whichever is earlier" which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay 8 Shri Achleshwar Mahadev Ji Sarvajanik Nyas v CIT (Exemption)Bhopal in case of old trust who made the application before learned CIT(Exemption) very late, that

EMERGENCY CHARITABLE TRUST,BASANT VIHAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2025-26

Charitable Trust, Vs. CIT (Exemption), 18-B, Basant Vihar, Gwalior. Bhopal. PAN : AABTE1300Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Alok Dhingra, Advocate Department by Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT/DR Date of hearing 17.07.2025 Date of pronouncement 30.07.2025 ORDER PER : SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been preferred by assessee against the impugned order dated 27.03.2025 passed on Application

STATE BANK OF INDIA,VRINDAVAN vs. CIT APPEALS 1, AGRA

In the result, ITA No. 65/Agra/2017 is allowed, whereas ITA

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

charitable organization having section 12AA and section 80G registration and hence not liable to pay tax, and so it should not be treated as an assessee in default. Many I.T.A Nos. 65& 66/Agra/2017 6 judicial precedents have been cited by the appellant in support of each of the above arguments. It is important to note that the appellant's default

LIPI JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Lipi Jain Family Trust, Vs. Ito (Exemption), Ward No. 18, Subhash Ward Gwalior Ganj Ashok Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Mp Pan: Aabtl3606J Assessee By : Shri Subhash Chand Jain, Ca Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12/09/2025

18, Subhash Ward Gwalior Ganj Ashok Nagar, Ashok Nagar, MP PAN: AABTL3606J Assessee by : Shri Subhash Chand Jain, CA Revenue by: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 20/08/2025 Date of pronouncement 12/09/2025 O R D E R 1. The appeal in ITA No.227/AGR/2025 for AY 2015-16 arises out of the order of the ld. JCIT(A), Faridabad

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S PREM MOTORS PVT LTD., GWALIOR

The appeals of the department are dismissed

18 observations of the Mumbai Bench decision in Bhaumik Colour (P) Ltd. (supra) that such observations are not binding on the Courts. Once it is found that such loan or advance cannot be treated as deemed dividend at the hands of such a concern which is not a shareholder, and that according to us is the correct legal position, such

ACIT-CIRCEL-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. MAYANK AGRAWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

18. In view of prima facie merits found in the legal objections raised in the Addl. Grounds of the Assessees, we do not consider it expedient to look into the aspects on merits of additions/disallowance as the legal CO Nos.04, 03 & 05/Agr/2025 objections on sanction granted under Section 153D of the Act has been answered in favour of the Assessee