BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 132(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka426Delhi260Mumbai184Bangalore104Chennai94Hyderabad71Jaipur55Cochin54Ahmedabad38Pune37Chandigarh37Lucknow26Amritsar24Kolkata22Allahabad16Calcutta16Indore14Visakhapatnam13Patna12Surat11Nagpur7Dehradun6Telangana6Kerala5Cuttack4Jodhpur3Agra3Rajasthan3Rajkot3SC3Raipur2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 132(1)3Section 132(4)3Addition to Income3Search & Seizure3Undisclosed Income3

VISHWAMBHAR DAYAL AGARWAL,AGRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 330/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

4) That the CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in not appreciating the fact that present assessment is made u/s 143(3) as it is Current " Year/Search Year. The question of applicability of section 153C does not arise as 153C is applicable only to preceding assessment years. Even considering the date of handing over

ACIT-CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. PUNEET AGARWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 338/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

4) That the CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in not appreciating the fact that present assessment is made u/s 143(3) as it is Current " Year/Search Year. The question of applicability of section 153C does not arise as 153C is applicable only to preceding assessment years. Even considering the date of handing over

ACIT-CIRCEL-2(1)(1), AGRA vs. MAYANK AGRAWAL, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, the CO raised by the assessee and appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 336/AGR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

4) That the CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in not appreciating the fact that present assessment is made u/s 143(3) as it is Current " Year/Search Year. The question of applicability of section 153C does not arise as 153C is applicable only to preceding assessment years. Even considering the date of handing over