JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JHANSI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4, AGRA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

trusts carrying out the activity of advancement of any other object of general public utility. Hence, the restriction put by section 11(4A) was still applicable to the other limbs in the definition of charitable purposes u/s 2(15) of the Act. 38. …………………… 39. The CBDT issued a circular dated 19.12.2008, paragraph-3 whereof reads as under:— "3

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

Trust to another is\nonly restricted to accumulations made in excess of 15% of income of the\nTrust, as referred to in Section 11(2) of the Act; and that the said prohibition\ndoes not apply, to current year income, or even to accumulations up to 15%\nU/s. 11(I)(a) of the Act.\nIt may be reiterated that

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, , GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Trust, as referred to in Section 11(2) of the Act; and that the said prohibition does not apply, to current year income, or even to accumulations up to 15% U/s. 11(l)(a) of the Act. It may be reiterated that the Diocese of Jalandhar stands notified U/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. This provision

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Trust, as referred to in Section 11(2) of the Act; and that the said prohibition does not apply, to current year income, or even to accumulations up to 15% U/s. 11(l)(a) of the Act. It may be reiterated that the Diocese of Jalandhar stands notified U/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. This provision

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Trust, as referred to in Section 11(2) of the Act; and that the said prohibition does not apply, to current year income, or even to accumulations up to 15% U/s. 11(l)(a) of the Act. It may be reiterated that the Diocese of Jalandhar stands notified U/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. This provision

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Trust, as referred to in Section 11(2) of the Act; and that the said prohibition does not apply, to current year income, or even to accumulations up to 15% U/s. 11(l)(a) of the Act. It may be reiterated that the Diocese of Jalandhar stands notified U/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. This provision

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Trust, as referred to in Section 11(2) of the Act; and that the said prohibition does not apply, to current year income, or even to accumulations up to 15% U/s. 11(l)(a) of the Act. It may be reiterated that the Diocese of Jalandhar stands notified U/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. This provision

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

3). Moreover, it may be mentioned that the benefit of Section 11 is not absolute or conclusive. It is subject to control of Sections 60 to 63. If it is found by keeping in view the provisions of Sections 60 to 63 that it is not so includible then such income does not qualify for any relief." Para

BUNDELKHAND GRAMOTTHAN EVAM SHAIKCHHIK VIKAS SAMITI,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD EXEMPTION, AGRA

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2021-22

11(1)(a) of the Act. 3 | P a g e I observe that the ITAT Bench, Chennai in the case of V. Ramakrishna Charitable Trust (supra) has held the same in favour of the assessee. For the sake of brevity, it is reproduced below : “8. Thus, it is clear that income earned by the trust during the previous year

OM DARSHAN TURST ,BAREILLY vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

11 Delhi reported in 175 ITD 729 had set aside and the C!T(E) was directed to grant approval to me assessee. The head notes of the said judgment read as under; "Section 80G, read with section 12AA, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 -Deductions - Donations to certain funds, charitable institutions - Assessee-trust was granted registration under section 12AA

THE VIJAYPUR PUBLIC CARRIER OPERATORS UNION,GUNA vs. ACIT RANGE 3, GWALIOR

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes

charitable trust and\nthereby eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Act, the income tax\ndepartment had preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble High Court and the\norder of the said High Court is pending. For this reason, the claim of exemption\nunder section 11 of the Assessee trust was denied by the Learned AO. Against\nthis assessment

DCIT EXMP.CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. BIRLA JAN SEWA TRUST, GWALIOR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaassessment Year: 2012-13

3) of the Act and especially when the trust was being run on the commercial lines by sharing of receipts with prohibited persons on lump sum or percentage basis?” 2. The assessee is a charitable trust registered since 21.11.1977 and is running medical institution (hospital) and also in the imparting of education. The assesses trust besides have registered u/s 12AA

SAMARPAN ANNAM DANAM CHARITABLE SOCIETY,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is allowed

3) of section 12AA of the Act. There the Commissioner would be bound to record the finding that an activity or activities actually carried on by the Trust are not genuine being not in accordance with the objects of the Trust. Similarly, the situation would be different where the trust has before applying for registration found to have undertaken activities

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

3. As your Honour mentioned during the previous hearing: - Relevant Extract of "Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B)" under Income Tax Act is provided below for your ready reference: "if he is not so satisfied, pass an order in writing, — (1) in a case referred to in sub-clause ii) or sub-clause iii) or sub- clause (v) of clause

THE VIJAYPUR PUBLIC CARRIER OPERATORS UNION,GUNA vs. ACIT RANGE 3, GWALIOR

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing)

3. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The Assessee is a charitable society and had filed its return of income claiming exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The Learned AO passed the assessment order wherein the benefit of exemption under section 11 of the Act was denied by recording

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION ,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurpose

3 of the paper book is reproduced as under:-\nSubject: Request for Clarification on the Rejection of Application of\nRegistration U/s 12AA and Submission of Missing Documents in\nthe case of Krishna Balram Foundation having Reference\nDIN: Appeal No. ITA 112/AGR/2025.\nRespected Sir,\nWe respectfully draw the Hon'ble Tribunal's attention to specific\nissues pertaining to the rejection

OMKAR MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY ,GWALIOR vs. CIT[EXEMPTION], BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Omkar Memorial Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society, Bhopal Room No. 201, Ii Floor, Reac, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaa08054B Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/02/2025

trust deriving profit in excess of 15%, then the Income Tax Act itself permits for accumulation in terms of section 11(2) of the Act to be utilized in future. Hence, in our considered opinion, surplus earning is not a sinful activity and in any manner does not hinder the concept of charity or charitable activities. Accordingly, the observations made

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

Charitable and Religious Trust and also not Registered u/s12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act but a Private Family Trust which is not liable for filing its Income Tax Return u/s139(4A) of the Income Tax Act. Moreover we are reproducing analysis of Sec 164(1) provided for Taxation of Private Discretionary Trusts: (a) When trust income includes