BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 200(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai990Delhi813Bangalore460Chennai264Kolkata204Jaipur163Ahmedabad131Hyderabad118Pune69Raipur60Calcutta53Indore40Chandigarh31Surat28Karnataka26Cochin26Nagpur25Lucknow24SC15Rajkot13Telangana11Visakhapatnam9Dehradun8Amritsar7Guwahati7Patna6Ranchi6Jodhpur5Rajasthan5Agra3Cuttack3Orissa2Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1Punjab & Haryana1Allahabad1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 26318Section 143(3)5Section 1474Section 1483Reassessment2Revision u/s 2632

YOGENDRA SHARMA,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ETAH

In the result, the appeal preferred by assessee is allowed

ITA 408/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Yogendra Sharma, I-4695, 2Nd Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Floor, Gali No. 4-B, Balbir Nagar Ward 3(2), Etah. Extension, Shahdara, Delhi. Pan :Cgkps6492J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50C

section 50C) Rs.8,40,000/- Cost of acquisition Rs.1,07,200/- Cost of improvement Rs.5,00,000/- Short term capital gains Rs.2,32,800/- 4. Aggrieved with the above order, assessee preferred an appeal before learned CIT(Appeals) and filed the detailed submission before him. After considering the detailed submissions, learned CIT(Appeals) sustained the additions made by the Assessing

SMT. SARIKA SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 56/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

200/- in the hands of the Assessee was to be brought to tax u/s 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This Income was neither brought to tax nor any inquiry was made during assessment proceedings. 1.2 In an attempt to evade the provisions of law and to deliberately mislead the Revenue Authorities, the Assessee has falsely stated that

SHRI ATUL SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 57/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

200/- in the hands of the Assessee was to be brought to tax u/s 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This Income was neither brought to tax nor any inquiry was made during assessment proceedings. 1.2 In an attempt to evade the provisions of law and to deliberately mislead the Revenue Authorities, the Assessee has falsely stated that