BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 1Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai256Delhi240Chennai101Jaipur76Bangalore68Chandigarh56Ahmedabad43Hyderabad42Kolkata36Nagpur35Pune27Cochin25Raipur19Rajkot17Indore11Surat10Cuttack10Visakhapatnam8Jodhpur8Varanasi5Dehradun4Ranchi2Agra2Jabalpur2Guwahati1Lucknow1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 87A10Section 111A3Section 1483Section 143(1)2Section 139(1)2Capital Gains2

PRAMOD KUMAR DUBEY,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,1(3), GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 314/AGR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Sept 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: BEFORE, SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Manuj Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 111ASection 112ASection 112A(6)Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 87A

capital gains taxable under that section exceeding Rs.1 lakh. No such exclusion is provided either in section 111A or in section 87A. 4.1 The AR further contended that section 115BAC(1A

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 8/AGR/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148

capital gains tax and, therefore, the Assessing Officer had Page 19 of 23 Tej Singh vs. ITO reasons to believe that the income had escaped assessment. In the instant case, admittedly, the notice was issued after four years but before six years. In our opinion, the reasons so recorded by the Assessing Officer was not sufficient to intiate proceedings under