Search: capital gains

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 178clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14843 Section 14715 Section 148A15 Section 15110 Section 151A5 Section 144B5 Reassessment5 Reopening of Assessment5

NITESH AGARWAL,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1)(3), AGRA

ITA 501/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Accoutant Member Nitesh Agarwal Vs Income Tax 29/81, Lakshmi Palace, Officer-2(1) (3), Namakkimandi, Agra- Agra 282003 Pan No Abnpa2197G Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Anurag Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR

Section 148Section 178Section 234ASection 234BSection 250(6)

178 of the ‘Act’ was served upon the ‘appellant’ and ex-parte assessment was completed without serving any Notice under section 148 of the ‘Act’ render the Assessment Order void-ab-initio. BECAUSE, the purported ‘Reasons’ as reproduced in the Assessment Order are No ‘Reasons’ in the eyes of Law. The so called ‘Reasons’ do not show any application

NITESH AGARWAL,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1)(3), AGRA

NITESH AGARWAL,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1)(3), AGRA

HARICHARAN RATHORE,ASHOK NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

BADARIPRASAD,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER GUNA, GUNA

SUNITA,SAHU vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

NARAYANI RATHORE,SHIVPURI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

ASHOK SAHU,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), JHANSI, JHANSI

M/S CHATTA SUGAR CO. LTD,MATHURA vs. A.C.I..T CIRCLE-3, MATHURA