BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 153A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,004Delhi826Jaipur365Bangalore299Hyderabad258Chennai240Ahmedabad145Cochin119Pune113Chandigarh91Nagpur75Visakhapatnam73Indore68Guwahati42Kolkata39Ranchi35Surat33Karnataka28Rajkot24Dehradun23Cuttack21Lucknow19Jodhpur18Raipur14Amritsar12Allahabad7Agra7Telangana6Kerala5Patna5Jabalpur5Calcutta2Varanasi2SC1Gauhati1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 10(38)21Section 153A9Addition to Income7Exemption5Disallowance5

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S SHYAM SUNDER & MANISH TAORI, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/AGR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Aug 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10(38)Section 153A

section 153A of the Act for the reasons that the said two cases were not centralized. 9. The sum and substance of the various finding as has been made in the assessment orders for A.Y. 2005-06 i.e first year of all the AOPs are summarized hereunder: SI.No. Observation / Finding Reference to Para & Page No. of Asstt. Orders

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S RAKESH SHIVHARE & NISHA MITTAL, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/AGR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Agra
19 Aug 2019
AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10(38)Section 153A

section 153A of the Act for the reasons that the said two cases were not centralized. 9. The sum and substance of the various finding as has been made in the assessment orders for A.Y. 2005-06 i.e first year of all the AOPs are summarized hereunder: SI.No. Observation / Finding Reference to Para & Page No. of Asstt. Orders

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S SUNIL KUMAR MITTAL & MAMTA MITTAL, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 128/AGR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Aug 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10(38)Section 153A

section 153A of the Act for the reasons that the said two cases were not centralized. 9. The sum and substance of the various finding as has been made in the assessment orders for A.Y. 2005-06 i.e first year of all the AOPs are summarized hereunder: SI.No. Observation / Finding Reference to Para & Page No. of Asstt. Orders

A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S VANDANA JAIN & RAMA BANSAL, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 169/AGR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Aug 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10(38)Section 153A

section 153A of the Act for the reasons that the said two cases were not centralized. 9. The sum and substance of the various finding as has been made in the assessment orders for A.Y. 2005-06 i.e first year of all the AOPs are summarized hereunder: SI.No. Observation / Finding Reference to Para & Page No. of Asstt. Orders

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2,, AGRA vs. M/S SAKSHI TAIRI & CHHAYA BATTAD, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 170/AGR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Aug 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10(38)Section 153A

section 153A of the Act for the reasons that the said two cases were not centralized. 9. The sum and substance of the various finding as has been made in the assessment orders for A.Y. 2005-06 i.e first year of all the AOPs are summarized hereunder: SI.No. Observation / Finding Reference to Para & Page No. of Asstt. Orders

SARITA AGRAWAL,GWALIOR vs. ACIT, GWALIOR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 170/AGR/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra14 Feb 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Sudhir Kumarmrs. Sarita Agrawal Acit Geeta Colony Aayakar Bhawan Dal Bazar, Gwalior- V. City Centre 474001 Gwalior-474001 Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Adxpk3445P Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 153A

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case he(sic. The) learn CIT(A) erred o considering the fact that when that are no incineration(sic. Incriminating) document found during search, the Capital assessment need not be disbursed until item are specific audition(sic. addition) based on incineration(sic. incriminating) document, have the order

ACIT CIRCLE-2(1), GWALIOR vs. SHRI SANDEEP TAORI, GWALIOR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 15/AGR/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra12 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT, DRFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, CA
Section 143(3)

1) Vs. Shri Sandeep Taori Aayakar Bhawan, 106, Deepa Laxmi City Centre, Gwalior Kherapanti Colony, Gwalior-474001 /""""""""./PAN/GIR No: AAOPT7924N Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT, DR Respondent by : Sh. Sanjay Kumar, CA Date of Hearing 12.02.2025 Date of Pronouncement 12.02.2025 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year