M/S CHATTA SUGAR CO. LTD,MATHURA vs. A.C.I..T CIRCLE-3, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2009-10]

II, Uttar Pradesh-281401 Vs Mathura-281004 PAN-AAACC8388C Appellant Respondent Appellant by Shri Anurag Sinha, Adv. Respondent by Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing 03.04.2025 Date of Pronouncement 01.07.2025 ORDER PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM, This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Agra, (hereinafter

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

142 (1) shall\nremain confined only to the specific reasons/ issues for which case has been\npicked up for scrutiny.\n(iii) To overcome this issue of elasticity in application of instruction,CBDT made\ncertain provisions. To prevent revenue leakage, AOs are allowed to convert\nlimited scrutiny to complete scrutiny and this power is allowed to them after\nfollowing certain

SMT. SARIKA SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

II. You are being given further opportunity to explain your case. You are once again requested to submit explanations and documents as called for vide Notice u/s 263 dated 27.10.2021 (copy of which is enclosed). III. I have examined the case record in your case for A.Υ. 2012-13 and on examination of the case record several issues have

SHRI ATUL SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

II. You are being given further opportunity to explain your case. You are once again requested to submit explanations and documents as called for vide Notice u/s 263 dated 27.10.2021 (copy of which is enclosed). III. I have examined the case record in your case for A.Υ. 2012-13 and on examination of the case record several issues have

RAMKISHAN,ALIGARH vs. ITO 4(1)(3) ALIGARH, ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2018-19]

section 147 of the Act. The information with the Assessing Officer was that the assessee had sold an immovable property to Sangwan Landco Pvt. Ltd. for a sale consideration of Rs.89,20,000/-. In response to to notice u/s 142(1) of the Act, the assessee in his reply dated 02.12.2022 stated that the immovable property sold was an agricultural